Thousands of extra $ are made every day by ripping people who just dont know about mechanics. I had the tintop in for a auto trans oil change, mechanic took me under the car to show me a problem he noticed on the differential, "mate your diffs stuffed, its locked up, id say the spider gears are stuffed"--- to which I pointed out it was a limited slip unit, not another word was spoken.
Honest? Possibly so. Fair in the way he went about it? Absolutely not.
Like most people Im not perfect and like yourself probably well beyond salvation. But I like to see a sense of fairplay.
If we all acted like this sorry episode ( possibly both parties ) then we would all be the poorer for it.
I apologise again for daring to express an opinion, especially after the kangaroo court expressed its judgement, perched atop their own high horses.
I've been thinking on this whole "give the dealer a chance to put things right" scenario for a while. I have come to the conclusion that the time for them to show themselves at their best is as the customer is contemplating doing business with them. The time for actually doing their best is when they are providing the service for which they have been contracted to provide. That is their opportunity to get it right. If they intend on just practicing, then they should do it for amateur $$. If they are charging top dollar then they need to provide top service.
Maybe it does take an apprentice an hour and a half to scratch his arse and an oil change, but if you want to charge the rates of an ace mechanic, then best work on getting that time down.
I remember some business (can't remember who) used to advertise that "It's the putting right that counts". I always thought that was the most ridiculous slogan - I'd rather deal with someone that gets it right the first time.
In most cases once the bill is paid, that's the end of story as far as a business is concerned, so by the same token, once the bill is presented and paid that should be the end of it. The OP paid his money, settled his account and is now perfectly free to voice his opinion of the deal done. If the business doesn't like it, they can contact him, or sort their act out.
Clearly the person behind the counter was prepared to make up anything on the invoice just to make their life easier in this instance.
Keep on chooglin'
What i dont understand is why he discovered the big heavy bill after the job was done?
Usualy it's presented to the customer "this is howmuch it'll cost" , then you give the ok. If not, then yeah they can put anything on the bill for whatever. because the job is now done.
His issue is the non-existent parts they tried to charge him for, The fact he paid a premium for the service is just a secondary point.
Anyone can pay for something and then discuss whether they were happy with the service provided. Happens billions of times every day, all around the world.
Its a little sad when you go to a place of business, get an idea how much its going to cost, You know its not great value for money (irrelevant if the owner is driving a pair of roller skates or a Lamborghini) yet you go ahead and they still fuck with ya that little bit extra.
It seems like bike shops in NZ are a 50/50 crapshoot as to whether or not you will get a good one.
To avoid running the gauntlet of NZ bike shops, it would be better in the long run to start learning how to do maintenance on your bikes yourself. Workshop manuals for most models can usually be found online somewhere. The money you would have paid on labour from a shop would be better invested by going into supercheap and building up the tools you'll need over time.
Start with the basic things like oil changes and slowly work your way up from there. You'll find yourself relying less and less on bike shops over time as your experience increases.
I do think you have a legit gripe over the filter, but the labour is most likely a standard charge as discussed here. It does seem a lot, if you have 2 bikes in the shed, maybe $100 worth of reasonable quality tools will be a good investment for the future- especially at $180 labour every time they both need an oil change.
In Mt Eden's defence- Your gripe is with the workshop. I have had many years and many $$$ spent upstairs and have been treated honestly, respectfully, and well by all the staff in sales and parts. Something that gets me returning year after year.. plus they are the Guzzi agents...
I do all my own servicing for the exact reasons of your original post (but mostly the cost)
Blast From The Past Axis of Oil
Buggered if I know where it says that, but I am aware of 2 cases where accounts have been reduced.
The court has used common times for similar work and in one of the cases at least reduced the hourly rate to one more appropriate to the industry concerned.
Similarly, I have seen "estimates" enforced by courts. On the basis that if I ask you for an estimate to repair my car, you are holding yourself out to be an expert in the field so you should have the requisite knowledge and experience to make an accurate estimate.
If I come back and it took say 50% longer, then where am I going to get the money from? I didn't budget on that.
Unless there are extenuating circumstances a figure of within 10% has been used in the past. Comes as a hell of a shock to people often when they find this out the hard way.
If giving an estimate you do need to take due care.
If you gave them a rate from the start and it was exorbitant I doubt the court could get involved on that side of things.
Hopefully one of the lawyers on here will comment. I'm no lawyer, but have unfortunately spent more time hanging around courts than anyone should have to.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks