i say we do what the trucks did a couple of years ago and do a slow moving protest on the main hiways and motorways in peak hour traffic. That will get the fuckers to listen to us.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
lol, any initiative i would "promote" would take more money than would be available and therefore would not be considered as viable...
The shift in attitude you're talking about is across all walks of life... motorcyclists are no different in that respect, but that still doesn't mean that the larger percentage of incidents are caused by motorcyclists... I guess we have no real proof... Is there a percentage of fuckwiotedness that you'd be happy with?
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Double post
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
As all good Kiwis know "She'll be Right" its the "no worries" approach to absolutely anything.
Pity its turning out to be so expensive, not just in $ terms.
Whatever.... None of this will have any effect whatsoever. ACC couldn't care less about justifying any of the increases. They are an insurance company now and it's all about the mighty dollar. All they are interested in is collecting more revenue, and they have a captured market, as none of us can pull out of their insurance scheme, unless we don't register our vehicles.
Also, most of us own cars, so saying 'put the ACC portion of car registration up so it doesn't affect us bikers' is a ridiculous argument. Either way, as Hitcher said, ACC will get it's increases.... The horse has bolted folks! Get used to it.....
All my opinion of course.....
A dream without a plan is just a wish!
Make it happen....
....DREAM+PLAN+ACTION=GOAL/TARGET
As a smart guy I know at work has pointed out a few times, a person might have a couple (or more) bikes, maybe 2 (or more) cars and even be rquired to drive a registered vehicle for work purposes. In all of these situations the largest risk variable is the same - the driver/rider. One person can only have one mode of transport on the road (under it's own power for the pedants who suggest A-frames & trailers) at any given time. Whilst the remaining vehicles are parked up they are only at risk of being in an accident in bizarre circumstances.
Perhaps individuals should be levied rather than vehicles? Perhaps then the accident prone could also have higher levies like a true insurance scheme?
Keep on chooglin'
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks