Yeah, and if it's a 'authorised dealer' you'll be told it's fair wear and tear... especially if it's a fucking suzuki.
Like it or not, you do anyway. It's called the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 and it's worth more than any warranty previously offered, manufacturer's or otherwise. And there's no contracting out (for non-business purchases). And you don't get to decide whether to honour it - a referee in the Disputes Tribunal does. And they almost always find favour with the consumer.
No, it doesn't! It's STILL a massive fucking rip-off!
Exactly. They prey on ignorance. Unless the problem can actually be shown to have been caused by that act, they cannot effectively decline warranty cover because anyone with more than half a clue would simply lodge a claim with the Disputes Tribunal.
To the OP... have a look in THIS thread too.
If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!
OUCH! I hope not for $450 big ones.
you got it in one, plus the fact we have change left over for a beer.I am surprised a manufacturer is okay with having their bikes go 10,000 km between oil changes. But I suppose it lets their owners brag about their longer service intervals.![]()
Shaken, not stirred in the shakey city!
How many of you experts in advise, have done a valve clearance service on a VL250 and can accurately advise how long it took you.
Nelson Rules
Certainly not! I do the simpler oil and filter type services myself. Even on my new bikes still in the warranty period.
It would suck though having a bike that requires a valve clearance check at every service... unless you learn to do it yourself... otherwise it won't exactly be a cheap bike to run.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks