Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Rego on hold/not current fines.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    17th October 2008 - 00:27
    Bike
    87 Honda VTZ250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    589

    Rego on hold/not current fines.

    The fine currently for not displaying a current vehicle licence (rego) is $200 from memory, but is the fine the same for having a vehicle licence which is on hold and using the vehicle?

    And in the act we have:
    http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/p.../DLM91421.html

    Every person who uses any motor vehicle or permits any motor vehicle to be used in contravention of subsection (1) of this section commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,000.
    So does this mean that the current $200 fine is just what the police/courts have decided is good enough at the moment but that the legislation means they COULD increase this right up to a thousand bucks with no warning?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    Yep.
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    13th September 2005 - 18:20
    Bike
    Crashed it.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by sleemanj View Post
    The fine currently for not displaying a current vehicle licence (rego) is $200 from memory, but is the fine the same for having a vehicle licence which is on hold and using the vehicle?

    And in the act we have:
    http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/p.../DLM91421.html



    So does this mean that the current $200 fine is just what the police/courts have decided is good enough at the moment but that the legislation means they COULD increase this right up to a thousand bucks with no warning?
    It's the difference between an Infringement Offence Fee $200 (for an individual) and a maximum fine on Summary Conviction of $1000 (for an individual). Payment of the infringement fee is an admission of guilt and a complete defense to proceedings toward a Summary Conviction. As I understand it.
    If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    13th July 2008 - 20:48
    Bike
    S1000XR
    Location
    Hanmer Springs
    Posts
    4,778
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Preload View Post
    It's the difference between an Infringement Offence Fee $200 (for an individual) and a maximum fine on Summary Conviction of $1000 (for an individual). Payment of the infringement fee is an admission of guilt and a complete defense to proceedings toward a Summary Conviction. As I understand it.
    Correct.

    All offences used to be via TON, and that avenue still exists. However, IONs were introduced to take the workload away from the courts, and give people a way to plead guilty without going to court.

    The TON, if issued, carries a maximum fine of $1000, at the discretion of the presiding Justice of the Peace. The ION carries a fine of $200, with nil demerits.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    You could probably get doubled charged - not being registered and not displaying a rego sticker!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    2nd May 2008 - 18:35
    Bike
    Big red
    Location
    Under a rock.
    Posts
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by AllanB View Post
    You could probably get doubled charged - not being registered and not displaying a rego sticker!
    Or triple charged - not paying ACC levy! $200, there's no escape.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •