
Originally Posted by
TonyB
Yep, I have a thought. There goes another one.
You ride an NSR 250. It has virtually no power at all below, what?, 6000rpm? It has a narrow power band, a close ratio gear box. It's light as, has a racer crouch seating position, clipons bla bla bla. OBVIOUSLY designed for travelling sedately at or below the speed limit (that would be sarcasm).
You make some good points. But I would love to see what happens when you get a bike that can effortlessly do 200k, rather than shreiking like a banshee and buzzing like a turbocharged viabrator. Take a ride on a 600+ and see how long you can resist it.
How far south of Nelson have you ridden? Sure, doing 200k anywhere north of the Kohatu pub would be reckless. But there are plenty of roads in our wee country that have excellent surfaces, are well marked/ signposted and have almost no traffic, cross roads or driveways.
There are even more roads where you can have an absolute ball without breaking the speed limit, but in reality you are putting yourself and others at greater risk than by doing 200k on the affore mentioned deserted roads. Think about it, if you're cranked over doing 95k around a 40k corner and you fall, your bike is going to hit something What if it's an on coming car? Just because you're below the limit doesn't mean that you aren't taking a risk.
Bookmarks