Originally Posted by
NONONO
"By any definition" surely not.
ACC is not now, nor has it ever been an insurance sheme/scam. Why are the apologists for the NATS and Judge so bloody determined to push this line in the face of the evidence?
Because they want to create an insurance company.
Originally Posted by
NONONO
Lets not go over all this shit again. Factualy, morally and logically the ACC Futures Coalition won this argument last year. Idealogicaly the Nats can not accept this as it would mean no sell off.
Don't you believe it. They've only said no selling the company wholesale in this term. Doesn't at all prevent them selling off parts of the business piece by piece until it's all gone.
And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.
- James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.
Bookmarks