ACC protest movement dead?

[idleidolidyll]

They are not privatising ACC, they are opening it up to competition, a big difference and it is only the work place.

You believe that bullshit????? Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

All i can say is well about time . All you people sit here and cry that the ACC levies are too high and then cry when they try and do something about it.

All they are doing 'about it' is to sell it off to mates for favours. ACC is the envy of the world and National is throwing it away without giving us back the right to sue. Fuck em; they're liars and chaets

If you don't want to go with another insurer than stay with ACC, no one will be forcing you to change.

And are you with the kiwibank??

I'm surprised that such naievity still exists over this subject after the oh so obvious screw over we receive by the smirking monkey and his sidekicks

[BoristheBiter]

I'm surprised that such naievity still exists over this subject after the oh so obvious screw over we receive by the smirking monkey and his sidekicks

You must vote labour as you have no valid facts to base your argument on so you resort to name calling and personally insult others.

Last time when the Nats where in and they opened it up they didn't sell it off, no changers where made to ACC, it just meant you could go somewhere else for your cover.

If you don't like the idea of being responsible for yourself and would like the government to hold your hand and wipe your arse then fine, but like a lot of other people I would like to choose what cover want.

[MSTRS:Me]

Last time when the Nats where in and they opened it up they didn't sell it off, no changers where made to ACC, it just meant you could go somewhere else for your cover.

We can make an educated guess though. It was a 'testing of the waters'. But they didn't stay in long enough to take it further.

[BoristheBiter]

We can make an educated guess though. It was a 'testing of the waters'. But they didn't stay in long enough to take it further.

Yes we can make an educated guess if labour was in we would be even worse off.

[MSTRS:Me]

Could be. Who's to know? One thing is for sure - it would be for different reasons.

How do we educate the public to vote for STV. That is the only way to get a truly representative parliament, and to get rid of the deadweight list members.

[James Deuce]

Yes we can make an educated guess if labour was in we would be even worse off.

Naaah, the only guarantee about any Government is that they'll give themselves pay rises even when the economy is on the verge of foundering and most people have experienced a net reduction in income over the last two years.

You've got to stop thinking National and Labour when you think "Government". It's why things are in such an unholy mess. Be creative. Use those two votes to meld a political vision together instead of relying on narrow interest parties who are firmly wedged in the status quo.

The only party with NZ's future at heart is the Maori Party. You may not agree with their policies and you most certainly won't agree with the essentially racist founding principles but they're the only party committed to maintaining a distinct NZ identity.

[riffer]

The only party with NZ's future at heart is the Maori Party. You may not agree with their policies and you most certainly won't agree with the essentially racist founding principles but they're the only party committed to maintaining a distinct NZ identity.

Be that as it may I have yet to hear one skerrick of information from the MP about economics and/or health issues that impact on anyone other than their current constituents. I fear that they remain tied to their racist founding principles too much to ever deal with more than one element of society's issues.