Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 75

Thread: Suzuki SV1000S vs Honda VTR1000

  1. #1
    Join Date
    8th April 2005 - 17:37
    Bike
    1996 Suzuki RF900RS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    3

    Suzuki SV1000S vs Honda VTR1000

    Can anyone give me some feedback on the pros and cons of the above bikes?
    I'm looking to buy new but can't decide which - one is a 2003 (Suzuki) or 2005 (Honda) Cheers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    22nd June 2004 - 01:10
    Bike
    1999 CBR1100XX Blackbird
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    341
    Don't have any experience with either but do a Google search on "SV1000S review" and "VTR1000 review".. it bought up a few hits.

    BC.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    14th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    ....
    Location
    ....
    Posts
    1,309
    The Honda looks beter....I have ridn both....and they both wheelie ok so what duz it matter

  4. #4
    Join Date
    18th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    big gay1 that I am not licenced to use
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    2,545
    Quote Originally Posted by R1AaronKDX
    The Honda looks beter....I have ridn both....and they both wheelie ok so what duz it matter
    Good old R1Aaron straight to the business..


  5. #5
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,590
    Well you do know that this post is going to be very one sided aye

    Ok..... If the question was VTR v TL then it would be a very tricky desision, but as its VTR v SV..... then IMHO Honda take it away

    The 1st thing that comes to mind is looks.... the VTR is a old looking bike now, well it has been around since 97, were as the SV is a modern looking bike which in my view is fuking ugley... altho the 05 SV's do look nice in black including frame, but your not looking at a 05, so looks are intirly up to you.

    The series 2 VTR's are very comphy to tour on were as the SV is not so ie: ass is above ya ears.
    The power on the SV is sooooo boring it has no kick in the arse power but a very lineal feel. The VTR having the largest carbs ever put out by the Japs (48mm) on a bike has a awesome power delivery tons a grunt down low slightly mild mid range then on comes all 110hp at once (SV 108hp) nothing in the bikes hp wise but compleatly differant feels to them.

    So you need to ride both.... that will soon have your mind made up you will know as soon as you get on the 2nd bike.

    ps: SV's are having some coolent leaking probs and noisie bottom ends (depending on who you listen too)
    VTR's are knowen to have the oll cam chain problems I have heard of them going as early as 50km (Aussie) but the Honda shop in Chch assures me that they have done 1 since 1997.
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  6. #6
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,590
    Quote Originally Posted by Cephas
    Suzuki SV1000S vs Honda VTR1000
    BTW.... welcome to KB mate

    Quote Originally Posted by R1AaronKDX
    The Honda looks beter....
    Ohhhhhh.... you do like my bike, and Manuboys SV is way harder to wheelie but stays up easier
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  7. #7
    Join Date
    17th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    XB12R, FXR150, Ducati 400ss, 1125CR
    Location
    dam.. i move too much
    Posts
    5,047
    yep... i have taken them both out for a test ride....

    the honda was really smooth, plenty of power......but..... boring

    the suzuki... that was FUN it was twitchy, you could feel the power coming on the bike felt like it was alive....it had soul!!!

    why didn't i buy?????

    no money


    what a ride so far!!!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    1st July 2004 - 11:19
    Bike
    El Bandito Negro
    Location
    a medicated stupor
    Posts
    1,334
    funny... two exactly opposite reviews there

    Try riding them
    Go with the one you like best

  9. #9
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,590
    Quote Originally Posted by ajturbo
    the honda was really smooth, plenty of power......but..... boring

    the suzuki... that was FUN it was twitchy, you could feel the power coming on the bike felt like it was alive....it had soul!!!
    1st of all aj.... no jap bike has 'soul'
    Now I dont understand how you find a 48mm carbed V2 'boring' as I said above heaps a down load snot (the SV will not lift frount at as a low rpm) every time a coconut the VTR will loft at 3k...... then a bit mild in the mid rpm's then a rush as the carbs dump every thing in the pots at about 6k... power wheelie time.

    The SV is injected revs out another 1k it is bland right from 1k to red line...... it does however pulls evenly right through the rev range more like a common muilty. The SV has no sudden get up and go like the VTR, this is why I think the SV is the more boring.
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  10. #10
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by dangerous
    Now I dont understand how you find a 48mm carbed V2 'boring' as I said above heaps a down load snot .
    as he said - the fuel economy is not that flash on the VTR, but they have typical honda reliability. i rode both before buying the TL, and i'd go for the ohlined rear shocked TL over both of 'em

  11. #11
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,590
    Quote Originally Posted by marty
    as he said - the fuel economy is not that flash on the VTR, but they have typical honda reliability. i rode both before buying the TL, and i'd go for the ohlined rear shocked TL over both of 'em
    yeah I know... like I said if it was TL v VTR...... but a SV is nothing like a TL, Suzuki detuned a bloody sweet motor... and made a girls blouse outa it.

    And yes..... when Manu and I ride together, the bitch sits at the servo with a gay grin on his face as I refuel for the 2nd time to his one.
    SV= on gas..... VTR= on gas.
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  12. #12
    Join Date
    16th September 2003 - 11:36
    Posts
    6,427
    Okay i did a side by side shoot out with a 02 vtr1000f(bog standard) and a 04 sv1000(nepture muffles, change screen, not to sure what else but its BRM mag bike) last weekend put 150km on each in one day, went from the vtr to the sv.

    SV1000 - first thing you notice is how bud fucken ugly the fucken thing is, its only a 5 speed, which isn't to much a problem at legal speeds, its geared alot lower so gets to 150 quicker than the vtr in its current form, but the sv felt like it was losing puff about 190ish mark, where the vtr just started stomping away from it. Being a FI bike its smooth and with good old suzuki gear box that smooth as. It feels like a long strech from seat to bars, and the screen gets in the way of the dash a touch, it feels more like you are sitting on top of it and in it.


    vtr1000f - good looking bike, everything looks good, well designed, 6 speed, its a little high geared really, i mean wife close to never uses 6 gear(unless over 200) in the 2 years she has had this bike, tons of grunt, it feels torque then than the sv, but with the carb motor its not as smooth as the sv, and the gear box is a little clunky, the vtr fuel range is good as long as you get one with a bigger size tank(02+ models had larger size)

    Personally if i was given the choice of these two bikes, i would buy the vtr over the sv,the vtr is an older model bike(pretty much around since 97 with no major changes[had a revamp in 01 or 02]) compared to the sv(around 2002 or 2003) as new bike.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    4th September 2004 - 22:36
    Bike
    XT
    Location
    Location is missing
    Posts
    648
    If you want reliable, buy the VTR.

    So far i have 116,000k's on the clock. Only problems i've had is a starter clutch failing, and the usual regulator prob.

    I rode a later model VTR not so long ago, i can see why people call them boring. So i'm still biased towards Suzuki.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    4th September 2004 - 22:36
    Bike
    XT
    Location
    Location is missing
    Posts
    648
    http://www.micapeak.com/reg/bikes

    Motorcycle registry site.

    Also, with the VTR, you wont have a problem with finding part's.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,590
    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon
    I rode a later model VTR not so long ago, i can see why people call them boring.
    You have lost he here... how can the later model be boring over the series1 VTR?
    Or is thay not what you mean?
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •