At no point have BRONZ claimed otherwise.
Please tell me when BRONZ stated - "We do not represent the voice of all motorcyclists in NZ"
My agenda is simple - questioning the need of such agencies.
This may come as a surprise - but as an individual I too have a voice. One that does not need a bullshit hierarchy to be heard.
Its a bit hard to have any form of Democracy when it goes through Chinese whispers.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Did someone say Chinese democracy... Great album!!!...
The Bikers Rights Organisation New Zealand (BRONZ) has existed for many years and supports the rights of motorcyclists. THE AIMS OF BRONZ Wellington INC are:
- To promote road safety through road user education.
- Education rather than legislation saves lives.
- To protect and promote the rights of the motorcyclist to decide his/her own future as a road user.
- Let those who ride decide.
- To promote and protect the general welfare of the motorcycling public.
You see dude, supporting and protecting the rights, and promoting and protecting welfare does not mean representing the voice. I guess it's possible that maybe at one time the collective voice of motorcycling may conflict with promoting and protecting the general welfare of the motorcycling public.
One particular example could be if the anti-helmet law became an issue again.
And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.
- James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.
Actually, I think having two political groups, plus the massive number of people in Ulysses as a third voice will be a great advantage to us.
While Central Government may desire to have only one group to dismiss or discredit, now it has two, or possibly three.
And when it claims it will consult, it now has to consider three groups.
It would be naive to assume that all three groups would simultaneously obtain a representative at NZTA or Ministry of Transport tables, having three focussed groups is a way of ensuring that we have a better chance of being there at all !
Our challenge as bikers is not to decide which (if any) of the groups we will support. It is to ensure that our groups always get a seat at the table, a consultation from media, and that bikers are heard.
MAG does not detract from BRONZ, it adds to it.
We double our chances of a seat, a press release and a say, as long as we don't allow them to divide us.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
You might call that a blip.
I'm certainly not going to rejoin and as bronz have only sent me three emails in a year I expect they will fail to send me a resubsciption request.
Don't worry BD,I know how passionate you are about bronz (I've stopped capitalising it too),you should be old enough to join Ulysses by now.
Nah - I'm not passionate. I try to be decent.
Admin - I don't know. Somebody giving Peggy a hand would probably sort it.
And I do stunts on a Ulysses.
What did you say about *unts in Ulysses?![]()
Did you just call me a *unt? :-)
What I was on about in the other thread.
I only have this as hearsay and am happy to be corrected by anyone who was actually there.
In previous 'crisis' the various clubs and organisations were affiliate members of BRONZ. Their reps sat on the committee and BRONZ was their political voice/activism.
The clubs themselves were apolitical, yet active.
Nice setup I thought.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks