Yeah it is, & yes always two sides- perhaps he's a git to be getting along with? but from her point of view I suppose she couldn't be too picky & not back the film, waiting for a better one to be made.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
got it for dad for xmas.........I haven't seen or heard from him for months
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Hi, I had the pleasure of working on the doco "Love Speed and Loss" and got to know Janeen.
I know she was very proud of the film, as she told me to my face, and she was not one to pull her punches.
However, I certainly don't expect everyone to like it .
I do however find the bickering between Tim and the Producer to be very sadding.
All that matters is Janneen and Kims story. The rest is rubbish.
I wish Tim the very best with his book.
I expect it will go into much more detail and give a different perpective.
Lets remember Kim ,a great engineer, rider and dad.
And Janneen his true love.
Is there is bickering between Hanna & the Producer? It seems to be a one-way street with Hanna making accusations in the forward of his book with the Producer not having the benefit of a right of reply. Given Hanna's notorious reputation for dishonouring agreements in the past (it's in the public domain this information and certainly known by many in the motorcyle racing and nostalgia community) Sadly, Hanna's one-sided story in the forward incorrectly denigrates the huge impact Love Speed & Loss has had globally. Google Kim Newcombe 5 years ago and you got barely a couple of FIM listings. Search now and the web lights up with all manner of appreciation for Kim and what he acheived so brilliantly and uniquely on the Konig.
Maybe he prefers to earn a crust.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
The book tells the same story as the film - the Titanic reference has been used before. A book will always offer much more opportunity for detail than a film, but I smell a rat. Not getting at you at all F5 Dave, but I suspect Tim Hanna's version of events as recorded in public in his book's Forward doesn't accurately capture all that happened. In fact, I know it is an unbalanced account. I heard plenty from Janeen about her deep despair and the number of times Tim's duplicity and negative nature caused her immense grief. Like in early 2004 after Tim promised Janeen his devotion to writing the Newcombe biography. Then the following weeks of silence until she discovered that he was writing the Munro book first to cash in on the Donaldson big-budget film.(Yes I know aren't we all glad he did take that on) She liked the film Love Speed & Loss too. She told me that most firmly and repeated it to many others, including two occasions on national TV news. Clearly persistent Timmy believes he can make whatever wild claims he wants. Since Janeen left us on Waitangi Day 2006, there remains only a handful of people privy to the truth that can challenge him. But unlike Tim I don't think they would act so maliciously. They would be unwilling to betray Janeen's trust by promoting Tim's micro squabbles in the public arena. They would not wish to detract from the material issue: Kim Newcombe and his extraordinary triumphs.
Last edited by Virago; 22nd February 2011 at 21:03. Reason: HTML
For such an innocuous pastime as writing biographies of sportspersons Hanna seems to atttact a lot of acrimony and 'nasty and unpleasant people' : One small example Tim Hanna wrote on one blog:
There has been some speculation about the John Britten biographies in your Forum of late. I wonder if I could clarify matters from my point of view?
I spent five years writing and researching John''s biography and knew him reasonably well. I gave the manuscript to Kirsteen Britten to check and she gave it to her cousin, a PR writer who mostly records her struggles to lose weight in the local rag. This less than amusing little barrel then read my manuscript and subsequently, in very short time, wrote her own version of John''s life with Kirsteen''s connivance.
As Kirsteen inherited millions when John died his somewhat lonely death (Kirsteen went skiing on his final day on God''s earth) I felt that legal action would simply exhaust me financially and emotionally.
I had already struggled for well over a year to get around Kirsteen''s legal attempts to prevent my book being published. That''s the story in a nutshell but there''s so much more and all of it is nasty and unpleasant. Some day I would like to write the real story of Kirsteen''s treatment of her dying husband, if I can just find the stomach to do it.
If anyone wants my book may I suggest they contact Millhouse Books in the UK.
Everyone he deals with is evil it seems? Or just persistant paranoia?
I sure don't know.
I'm on 'friendly chat at media functions' terms with Tim and Richard. Both are very pleasant to me and I have no intention of buying in to it.
I still admire the dedication to get something like that to bed - and wish I'd thunked of the friggin' Documentary Channel. Ei ei ei.
Kim's story, no matter how or who tells it is aweinspiring. A couple of observations for comment perhaps:
1 - Hanna makes no mention of Janeen's passing.
2 - Hanna's style of writing is verbose to the extreme, so much so I had to persevere - where I would have gladly chucked it. (Didn't notice it so much in the Britten and Munro books?)
It's OK to disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.
Talking of writing styles check out the review someoneleft on amazon about this book down the bottom of the page.
http://www.amazon.com/Japans-Motorcy...0912828&sr=8-1
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
It's OK to disagree with me. I can't force you to be right.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks