Sort of. If you can imagine an event, disaster, or whatever being a long tube. You take a slice out of the tube - that is the piece that the media sees. It reports on that snapshot in time and generally to the best of their ability.
If you are familiar with the subject, you will have a broader picture of what took place, and therefore a different perspective.
The media these days in NZ is dominated by the big Aussie companies. They have screwed down staff numbers and "streamlined" their operations. This has the effect of making the "slice of the tube" a lot smaller than previously.
In my day we had "roundsmen" who would be assigned to work on nothing else but, say the police, or the courts, or traffic, or the local council. Therefore their snapshot of an event was backed by a pretty thorough knowledge of what led up to it. Their contacts with senior people would be finely developed and the accuracy of information the reporter was getting would also be better.
It's all changed now and the rounds system is nowhere near as strong as it was - non-existent in a lot of key areas.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
tell it like it is... whats the point in anything else?
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks