Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Yeah, but it's still gotta be easier for a colourblind person to see a different colour than have to look at the position of the light in the tree. I mean, that's the idea of having different colours right? I'm not saying they can't get by, I'm saying it could be easier. Meh, I'm not colourblind so it doesn't even affect me![]()
Hard to know which is more worthy of a darwin award, the one that ignores the red or the one that believes the green.
I'm sorta in the treat them like fuckwits and that's how they'll behave camp. And damn, the sheer quantity of spurious signage makes for quality fuckwits.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
I am quite badly colour blind, and work on top, middle and bottom lights rather than going by the colours. Worked ok until I lived in Wellington for a while and used to ride out on that section to the Hutt to go over the hill. Some of the traffic lights are mounted back to back and have more than three aspects. So in one direction the opposing signal head is one aspect higher meaning that on the approach the red light isn't at the top of the signal head shape, it is down one, if you get what I mean, so I took it as the middle light. Which it wasn't. Bloody confusing. In the end I gave up stopping for any of them. Found I blended in with the locals better.
For the record, I'm the team leader of a group of Popos that enforce the traffic light rules in Chch.
We stake intersections out, and write tickets for those who break the rules.
One Popo (normally me) sits in a position to view the offences, then radios the Popos who are positioned to stop the offenders and write the tickets.
As a result, I am in a strong position to write about how people who have driven through late yellow or red lights who deny having done so. I get told at least 2 or 3 times each morning rush hour that what I have seen didn't happen.
Like, I see someone drive through a red light, then have the driver tell the ticketing officer that it was orange, or in some cases, green.
Until we get out of our mental state of psychological denial, traffic light crashes will just keep on happening.
Donuts.
We looked at video for all traffic light offences, but it would take about 8 cameras to cover every phase at one intersection.
The problem with video too is that it sets a standard. If I turn up at court with video evidence of every offence we see, that would raise the JPs expectations for every other offence.
Like, I video an offence, and turn up to court. The JPs watch the video, and convict the driver. The next week I see someone riding a motorbike without wearing a helmet, so I write him a ticket. He defends it, so I trundle off to court. The guy claims that I am a liar, and that he was wearing a helmet. He tells the JPs that I have a quota, and that I made the offence up so I get a free toaster at the end of the performance year. Next thing, the JPs ask to see the video of the offence..................which doesn't exist.
That's the problem. Video is great evidence, but it's not possible to video every offence we see. If we use it too much, we set an evidential standard, that detracts from the basic form of evidence that has existed for decades ; a cop seeing something, telling the court what he saw, and the court then making a decision based on the facts they accept and the credibility of the parties..
Don't think video is the panacea for all.
During the last major auckland power outage (about 4 years ago maybe?) they were predicting traffic chaos because lights were out. But it was the quickest commute ever and auckland drivers were actually considerate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks