I don't think anybody disagrees that there are many cases that an accident could be avoided. The argument (mostly promoted by you) that was being disputed was that every accident could be avoided. But rather than argue that, you chose to ignore most of the post and argue the obvious exaggeration, which is completely pointless.
Richard
That's because with "almost every crash report" there most certainly is something that could have been done to avoid it.
Are you starting to understand the difference between 'every' and 'almost every'?
(And even the accidents that there doesn't appear to be anything that could have altered it, it certainly does no harm to examine the possibility that something might have been done).
I didn't line up for a shot of experimental gene therapy juice.
History will record me as one of the smart ones.
Hasn't anyone kicked cockman off his soap box yet?
(Like a frecking dunny budgie buzzing about while you take a dump)
Yep, got that quite well, thanks.
I guess it's when you 'examine' that possiblity in the cases where most consider it unlikely, or there are simply too few facts known to have any idea, that the impression is formed that you think it's 'every'.(And even the accidents that there doesn't appear to be anything that could have altered it, it certainly does no harm to examine the possibility that something might have been done).
The main problem, though, is that by 'examining the possibility' in every case, you disrespect the rider, who in circumstances you can never be fully aware of (even if they tell you what they can), failed to avoid an accident.
Who knows what could have gone wrong in the heat of an accident. Moving objects create a distraction, which is good because that may well be what lets you know that front wheel is turning - but if a pedestrian hesitates on the other side of the road a moment earlier, that needs processing too, and the turning wheel could easily be missed.
Richard
I am of the exact opposite belief.
I believe that not examing all possibilities to learn from an accident is showing disrespect to the rider - particularly in the case of a fatal accident where the only thing that rider has left to offer us is the possibility of a lesson to be learned.
I didn't line up for a shot of experimental gene therapy juice.
History will record me as one of the smart ones.
So - it's back to The World vs Katman, eh?
Seems to me that The World has a problem with hearing inconvenient and uncomfortable truths...
Haven't you lot worked out that Katman is the epitome of a Realist?
And Steve? Wouldn't you do well to acknowledge, publicly, that just sometimes nothing could be done to alter an outcome?
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
To drag this back on topic.
Who hear believes what the police says yet? because that was why everyone wanted a tissue in the first place.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
That's about right...slightly under 10% of posts in any thread will be on topic...
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks