By the way - if you have a mathematically inclined mind and happen to like riding sportsbikes fast...
If this hypothetical rider stopped every single time the 5-0 suggested they did, this would probably be between 5 and 10 times a year. Each time would result in a ticket, because the speeds were always in excess of 10km/h over the limit. Allowing for the odd 30+, 40+ that would allow for a ticket to be issued, as opposed to the 50+ that was instant loss of licence, and you're talking about thousands of dollars in fines, an excess of demerit points and certain suspension of licence through those excess points. So the individual would then either spend 90% of their time not riding their bike, or they would spent 90% of their time riding whilst disq and running the risk of further infringements that would occur.
And everytime said hypothetical individual gets a ticket/conviction on their bike, they have an obligation to advise their insurance company who insure their CAR/s. The outcome would be that the insurers would increase the premiums/excess/decline coverage. Leaving the individual either uninsured or in debt.
So simplistic people say "stop, take the ticket, do the crime do the time". That's cool - $300 and 40 demerits mean nothing to the hypothetical individual. But it's what happens when a few of these combine that it suddenly means you're doing a runner not from $300 and 40 demerits, but from thousands of dollars and huge risks. So it puts the "high" risk of a runner back in perspective.
"You, Madboy, are the Uncooked Pork Sausage of Sausage Beasts. With extra herbs."
- Jim2 c2006
Bookmarks