It was interesting to watch that item on tv, but I found I had little sympathy for the late driver or for the idiot who survived. Very easy for him to say - with no fear of contradiction - "I told him he was going too fast for that corner because I know that road" and "I asked him to please slow down". I'm sorry, but am I the only one to find those statements a little trite now the guy is dead? By the sound of it he was an accident waiting to happen - been disqualified before, had numerous speeding and other driving offences under his belt, known for driving fast, etc. Hello, but what was this guy doing in the car with him in the first place? If he was his best mate, why had he not had this chat with him before, and if he had, why did he continue getting in the car with him, knowing what he was like?
It's hard to know what the answer is (and getting a driving 'celebrity' involved isn't going to make any difference) - some people get their licence, drive/ride responsibly and never have an accident or do anything stupid. Others have their licence five minutes and kill someone. As long as there are people who think driving like a racing driver on the open road is cool, there will be accidents like this. Speed itself doesn't kill (if it did, every F1 driver would be dead), inappropriate speed, lack of skill and a whole bunch of other factors including weather, alertness, etc. CONTRIBUTE to accidents - they don't CAUSE them.
I'm not sure about raising the age, but perhaps making the test more practical rather than just theory could help. Limiting the engine size is a nice thought, but I wonder if it makes any difference - you can still kill yourself in a 1300 and some of the smaller cars are just as quick as those with larger engines. Perhaps if we banned spotty beanie wearers and those who wear their caps backwards from driving it would be a start!
Yes, I am pedantic about spelling and grammar so get used to it!
Bookmarks