Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Wacky Wheels

  1. #1
    Join Date
    14th January 2005 - 21:26
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    856

    Wacky Wheels

    Imagine taking one of these in to your local shop to get a new tyre fitted.....could ask them to re-spoke it I suppose....tell them "they all fell out"

    http://www.osmoswheel.com/pages/application_motos.asp

  2. #2
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    They could make that look really good. Shame they made them look all concept like

  3. #3
    Join Date
    24th January 2005 - 15:45
    Bike
    2022 Suzuki GSX250R
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    2,209
    Bloody good idea, those wheels.

    The most efficient flywheels have fuck-all mass in the centre and heaps of mass around the rims.

    Those wheels are the ultimate flywheels - absolutely zero mass in the centre - they're nothing but rim.

    The gyroscopic effect of those wheels would surpass that of any standard wheel. A motorbike is essentially 2 flywheels/gyroscopes held together by a frame and we use that fact to steer it, keep it upright etc.

    I saw something like those wheels on "Beyond 2000" may years ago on an experimental bike but this is the first time I've seen a production machine using them.

    Dunno if I'd go for the designs they have, but I'd certainly be up for hubless wheels on a bike.
    Motorbike Camping for the win!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolf
    Bloody good idea, those wheels.

    The most efficient flywheels have fuck-all mass in the centre and heaps of mass around the rims.

    Those wheels are the ultimate flywheels - absolutely zero mass in the centre - they're nothing but rim.

    The gyroscopic effect of those wheels would surpass that of any standard wheel. A motorbike is essentially 2 flywheels/gyroscopes held together by a frame and we use that fact to steer it, keep it upright etc.

    I saw something like those wheels on "Beyond 2000" may years ago on an experimental bike but this is the first time I've seen a production machine using them.

    Dunno if I'd go for the designs they have, but I'd certainly be up for hubless wheels on a bike.
    Wouldn't be that good for handling as it would want to keep the bike upright instead of going to the side and turning. Would make a very stable cruiser though

    Wonder why they stopped that "Beyond 2000" show...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    24th January 2005 - 15:45
    Bike
    2022 Suzuki GSX250R
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    2,209
    Quote Originally Posted by alarumba
    Wouldn't be that good for handling as it would want to keep the bike upright instead of going to the side and turning. Would make a very stable cruiser though

    Wonder why they stopped that "Beyond 2000" show...
    Countersteering, unless I'm way off, works because you're turning a gyroscope (front wheel) which causes it to tilt and thus the bike tilts - despite the gyroscopic "stabilisation" afforded by the rear wheel. Surely with an improved gyro on the front, your countersteering would be more efficient.

    Physics students feel free to correct me - I wimped out and took chemistry (so correct me politely or get used to checking your ignition systems every day... )

    On "Beyond 2000" the test rider reckoned it handled beautifully.
    Motorbike Camping for the win!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolf
    Countersteering, unless I'm way off, works because you're turning a gyroscope (front wheel) which causes it to tilt and thus the bike tilts - despite the gyroscopic "stabilisation" afforded by the rear wheel. Surely with an improved gyro on the front, your countersteering would be more efficient.
    As far as I know, the lighter the rims, the easier it is to flick the bike from side to side because you don't have the gyroscopic resistance. Thats why carbon fibre/magnesium rims are so cool

  7. #7
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551

  8. #8
    Join Date
    28th May 2005 - 08:34
    Bike
    No bikes at my house
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    785
    So if you dropped a bearing at 200 clicks the rim would fall off?
    No thanks

  9. #9
    Join Date
    19th January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    none
    Location
    Tredding water
    Posts
    6,100
    Wondered when people would start putting those on sport bikes.

    Sever
    Now and forever
    you're just another lost soul about to be mine again
    see her, you'll never free her
    you must surrender it all
    And give life to me again
    Disturbed - Inside the Fire


  10. #10
    Join Date
    19th October 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    1998 suzuki RG150e (AETC)... X2
    Location
    Canterbury University
    Posts
    427
    they would look awesome on any bike really.

    Can anyone photoshop one for us? (i would but i am no good at using photoshop, and don't have it anyway)



    ... ALWAYS WATCHING
    I suffer from hooliganism.... Know me before you judge me
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...7&postcount=83
    i need to practice my "this shit doesn't burn" face
    Welcome, ZorsT.
    You last visited: 1st November 2007 at 22:15

  11. #11
    Join Date
    24th January 2005 - 15:45
    Bike
    2022 Suzuki GSX250R
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    2,209
    Quote Originally Posted by alarumba
    As far as I know, the lighter the rims, the easier it is to flick the bike from side to side because you don't have the gyroscopic resistance. Thats why carbon fibre/magnesium rims are so cool
    Hmmmm. Thanks for the links. Dymag seem to be making the complete opposite to an "ideal gyroscope" - weightier hub, light rim. I would presume they are doing it for a reason, that it is what the performance riders are demanding.

    Blows my theory, big time.

    Also very polite, alarumba - you can start your vehicles without fear...
    Motorbike Camping for the win!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    19th October 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    1998 suzuki RG150e (AETC)... X2
    Location
    Canterbury University
    Posts
    427
    I thought the lighter the UN SUSPENDED weight, the eaiser it is to flick around?
    I suffer from hooliganism.... Know me before you judge me
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...7&postcount=83
    i need to practice my "this shit doesn't burn" face
    Welcome, ZorsT.
    You last visited: 1st November 2007 at 22:15

  13. #13
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    I'm just going by what I've read and been told

    I'll save up for a set maybe. Could get a F3 bike for the same money though

  14. #14
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    http://www.bikehps.com/ProductFiles/DymagWheels.html

    Bit pricey. Would be interesting to see how it effects your bikes handling and performance

    Awfully tempted to save up for a set. Not sure if streetstock rules would allow them



    These ones are for the GP125s so should fit my CBR. A front rim weighs 2.2kg!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •