the initial media stories released seem to be driven by the 'hunch' of what the first officer on the scene believed to have happened. If the cops viewed the footage straight away (they all have laptops in their squad cars) then they could at least make a half accurate report on what actually happened.
I don't think it would make any difference.
We all know "the camera doesn't lie"...but we also know that a camera cannot capture everything, either. Also, a camera can give a somewhat distorted impression of what happened.
Besides, who in their right mind is going to include their speedo in the frame?![]()
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
it was just an idea... bad rep was kinda harsh![]()
This sort of thing really scares me. A 3 year old should be experimenting with life, not worrying about life's risks. Our society has become so risk averse that it's starting to seriously get in the way of living. So a few people die, so what? We all die at some point. If I happened to know one of them then it would hurt but, quite frankly, we care far too much today about people we've never had anything to do with. Before the advent of mass media the general mortality rate was a lot higher than it is today. Did the average member of the public really care? No, they didn't, because they didn't get to hear about it. They just got on with their lives in blissful ignorance.
Now I'm not saying that there weren't things that needed to change because the risk was unacceptable. What I am saying is that most, if not all, of these have already changed and we have now moved on to the lesser risks that just aren't a problem in daily life.
Do I wish the road toll was lower? Of course. However, it has become clear to me that the cost of reducing it any further (if this is even possible) is just plain too high. Just look at all the monitoring technologies that are being considered for all motor vehicles. In the name of saving ONE life the true life of that person, and the rest of us, is being systematically taken away.
Life involves risk. This will never change. Because of this we have been hard-wired by evolution to cope with it to the point that we actually require a certain level of risk or we go mad (just look at the popularity of extreme sports).
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Kids at 3yrs old are only really repeating what they've heard from others.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks