WCC is about to stab all motorcyclists in the back

[Ronin]

And do what? Plead? Cry? Beg?

You're pissing into the wind discussing anything like this with any official. The only solution is to fuck them up in a court of law - that will remove their ability to move against us, and then their hands are tied.

Mr Angry Little Man is back and still spouting complete shite.

How loud did you cry to the cops (and the law you so despise) when your worker was assaulted Steve.

Fucking hypocrite.



FWIW, good luck with the meeting.

[cheshirecat]

What really gets me pissed about this is that all WCC Councillors, as part of their pay package, are entitled to a fully paid for, covered car park within the council buildings. This “FREE” parking that only they are entitled too and their wages are paid for by your rates.

No other people in council are allowed to park in their spots and get hammered when they do, even for a short period of time.

Mrs Helen Ritchie leaves her car there 24/7 and lives in the Dominion Apartment building.

These pricks get paid for doing fuck all except screwing up our city and making fucked up decisions most of the time.

Celia Wade brown parks her push bike in hers FFS ……

Do council officials park for free - Can we find out? This can be used.

[Dodgy_Matt]

Do council officials park for free - Can we find out? This can be used.

Any one who works at council can be classed as a "council official"
Who you mean?

[davereid]

I think its only councillors who park free. The workers must find their own parks except I would expect senior management.

[cheshirecat]

Those behind the anti bike stuff

[Dodgy_Matt]

I think its only councillors who park free. The workers must find their own parks except I would expect senior management.

In the basement at Council you have the councillor’s car parks, senior manager’s car parks and then council vehicle car parks...
Staff must find their own parking in town just like anyone else..

No parking down there for Bikes....

[Dodgy_Matt]

Those behind the anti bike stuff

That would be the councillor’s and senior manager’s

[cheshirecat]

so would senior managers get subsidised or free parking?

[Dodgy_Matt]

so would senior managers get subsidised or free parking?

No, Not out in the city streets.
Tho I would say if they did get a ticket it would prolly get squashed....

[DingoZ]

Nope. You're still a raving Penis.

Aww fook it, I gotta spread the rep before giving it to Crasher....


Dam near spilt my coffeee when I read that. But isn't calling him a penis, even a raving penis, hinting that he might be useful...

[CookMySock]

And we take them to court for what Steve???? Wanna tell us exactly what law this council is breaking we can sue them over?

Thats not what I mean bro. I mean, prevent them from taking US to court. Revoking consent in a summary court works, but people are too scared to do it.

Parking policy is theres to make, the consultation process we are following is the only chance at input we get

No, and no.

1.) NO PERSON except the high court tells you or I what to do, unless we agree to settle the matter with them.

2.) Representation IS CONSENT, and if you turn up and state your case with the WDC then you consent to the outcome. But do you?

Protesting is just another government-organised way for you to consent to their rule. This is why any "consultation" always comes out their way.

Think about it.

[theseekerfinds]

shit mate, shouldn't you be taking this international??

[StoneY]

2.) Representation IS CONSENT, and if you turn up and state your case with the WDC then you consent to the outcome. But do you?

Protesting is just another government-organised way for you to consent to their rule. This is why any "consultation" always comes out their way.

Think about it.

Dude...what are you ON???? Where can I get some?

[FJRider]

1.) NO PERSON except the high court tells you or I what to do, unless we agree to settle the matter with them.

2.) Representation IS CONSENT, and if you turn up and state your case with the WDC then you consent to the outcome. But do you?

Protesting is just another government-organised way for you to consent to their rule. This is why any "consultation" always comes out their way.

Think about it.

I've thought about it ... and decided ... you're not even close to ANY semblance of the truth ...

Nothings changed for you there ...

Wikipedia says this about by-laws ...

Municipal by-laws are public regulatory laws which apply in a certain area. The main difference between a by-law and a law passed by a national/federal or regional/state body is that a bylaw is a made by a non-sovereign body, which derives its authority from another governing body, and can only be made on a limited range of matters. A local council or municipal government gets its power to pass laws through a law of the national or regional government which specifies what things the town or city may regulate through bylaws. It is therefore a form of delegated legislation.

Within its jurisdiction and specific to those areas mandated by the higher body, a municipal by-law is no different than any other law of the land, and can be enforced with penalties, challenged in court and must comply with other laws of the land, such as the country's constitution. Municipal bylaws are often enforcable through the public justice system, and offenders can be charged with a criminal offence for breach of a bylaw. Common bylaws include vehicle parking and stopping regulations, animal control, building and construction, licensing, noise, zoning and business regulation, and management of public recreation areas.


To NOT PROTEST is implied consent ...

NEXT local elections ... vote ... StoneY for Mayor ... ???

[Virago]

Thats not what I mean bro. I mean, prevent them from taking US to court. Revoking consent in a summary court works, but people are too scared to do it.


No, and no.

1.) NO PERSON except the high court tells you or I what to do, unless we agree to settle the matter with them.

2.) Representation IS CONSENT, and if you turn up and state your case with the WDC then you consent to the outcome. But do you?

Protesting is just another government-organised way for you to consent to their rule. This is why any "consultation" always comes out their way.

Think about it.

You pop in occasionally to high-handedly espouse your rather fanciful concept of "I don't consent to your jurisdiction, so therefore your laws don't apply to me".

This is precisely the approach taken by some ethnic radicals in New Zealand - funnily enough, they invariably find that approach doesn't work, and that the laws of the land apply to all. One was marched off to jail yesterday, still refusing "consent".

If you could show some tangible and verifiable evidence that such an approach actually works (and has worked), then it may perhaps be given some credence. Until then, it appears to be little more than the deranged ramblings of an equally deranged individual.

Either put up - or shut up.