Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Lawyer critical of drink driving reporting

  1. #1
    Join Date
    24th September 2008 - 01:32
    Bike
    a shiny new(ish) one
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    3,650

    Lawyer critical of drink driving reporting

    from newstalk ZB
    A lawyer who specialises in criminal drink driving cases is critical of suggestions that friends and associates of drunk drivers should be held accountable.

    Bay of Plenty Coroner Wallace Bain says that of the 32,000 drunk driving charges handed down every year, 7000 are repeat offenders.

    He suggests legislation would make those who fail to intervene with drinkers getting behind the wheel more responsible.

    But barrister Karen Harding says you can't expect people to be accountable for others.

    "It's not really effective. There is judgement issues. Some people still don't realise a person might be over the limit," she says.

    Ms Harding says it's time for the justice system to be more proactive with first offenders, to see if they have a problem with alcohol.

    By Nicola Grigg


    going to agree with the lawyer on this one for two reasons
    1) if you are with your mate who is drinking, you probably are drinking too, so why would your judgementbe any better than theirs
    and
    2) most of the problems prevalent in our society currently, stem from the inability, or unwillingness, to accept personal responsibility for ones own actions. Such a legislative move would only promote such poor attitudes.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    Agreed Tim. Generally the law does not impose positive requirements to act. You can stand back and watch an assault, a robbery, or a stranger dying of injuries. The exception is the requirement for caregivers to provide the necessaries of life for their children/elderly.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    19th July 2007 - 20:05
    Bike
    750 auw
    Location
    Mianus
    Posts
    2,247
    I agree too.

    BUT.

    Should people who know about child abuse and do nothing be held to account? If so, why the different principle?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    8th August 2011 - 08:29
    Bike
    03 VTR1000
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    206
    Be very hard to enforce and prove through the courts. How about just providing effective deterrants to stop offending in the first place? And even harsher deterrants for reoffending

  5. #5
    Join Date
    24th September 2008 - 01:32
    Bike
    a shiny new(ish) one
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    3,650
    Quote Originally Posted by Usarka View Post
    I agree too.

    BUT.

    Should people who know about child abuse and do nothing be held to account? If so, why the different principle?
    You are now talking about a seperate issue.
    people who SEE child abuse are not responsible for the person doing the hitting/harm.

    Doing nothing about it once you realise whats going on is something else altogether.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    21st October 2009 - 11:23
    Bike
    > 1 < 10
    Location
    Auckland,North Shore
    Posts
    826
    easy really.............zero tolerance..........no grey area there
    ***** POLITICIANS *****
    People Of Little Integrity Thieving Innocent Citizens Incomes And Need Shooting

    *******KASPA*******
    Knavery Artificial Spurious Pretentious Arseholes

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •