They're saving that up until they want to put more acc tax on us I reckon, look how well it did last time... :sic:
Mopeds feature far less in the fatal stats, and from the total road safety numbers they generally quote, that is what they are focused on. Maybe they just didn't want to change to much at once, as I really can't see any reasons to leave the moped class unchanged. We have already seen they aren't too worried whether their propaganda sticks or not, so I doubt that is the reason.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Any evidence for that?
Without doing any research: I would expect number of motorcycles per motorcyclist to increase with wealth which generally increases with age. I'm sure the average age of motorcyclists is much higher now than in the 70s but I wouldn't be so confident about the last 10 years. The born agains might be balanced out by the more recently licenced, who tend to be younger.
This is of course speculation, I'm hoping someone will be bothered proving me right or wrong.
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
That sort of thing is at the limit of what stats can provide, multiple bike ownership may be one for yourself and one for the wife or kids or work etc, older licensed riders might not ride anymore.... I agree with katman in that it is still not a perfect measure, but I think it is far more meaningful than a per/km one. Better yet would be a distribution table with number of kms traveled along one axis, and relative risk on the other. Even just a per/km measure for the different cc brackets I think would paint a different picture.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
When are these proposed changes due to go through?
[Edit] Nevermind, apparently my reading comprehension is lacking. "which will come into force in October this year or October 2012".
Riding to work on the motorway with the poor standard of driving you get here I fell at least 20 time more vulnerable than in my very solid 2001 VW van.
I see lots of scooters on my other commute down Dom Road....they ride like they are visible and drivers care....... I did not realize you could ride one on a car licence
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
I'm sure the average number of motorcycles per current motorcyclist is far greater than 1, just not that there's any reason to think that this number (whatever it is) is higher now than 10 years ago.
Would it be difficult to find the number of newly registered bikes, number of bike registrations cancelled and number of Class 6 learner licences issued in each year?
I heard Charlie Lamb speak last night. He loves stats.
Basically I came away thinking that you can choose a position on something, then manipulate the stats to suit. Worked for Nick Smith.
According to Charlie, the worst bike in terms of crashes is a 250. It's the most common engine size by far. Heaps more than any other engine size. And why? Coz the riders of 250s are, normally, the most inexperienced group. SURPRISE !!
So why does my bloody 800 cost so much to relicence?
Harumph............
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks