the same as everywhere else
higher than the normal tolerance (eg 40%)
open ended - police should not enforce the speed limit n passing lanes
TOLERANCE is NOT law ... get over it ...
IGNORANCE of the laws you find unconvenient will ALWAYS attract the attention of Plod .... eventually ... some get lucky and don't ... some ... just run out of luck ...
ARROGANCE of the motorist in assuming cops HAVE to give "tolerance"... Discretion is NOT automatic lessoning of charges ... or lessoning of fine amounts ... just THEIR choice to take what THEY believe their actions should be ... Such is life ...
STUPIDITY of some ... who attempt to defend their "right" of tolerance ... regardless of the circumstances ... that led to their driving/riding style, that attracted the attention of said Plod ... and insist THEIR opinion of the law as THEY think it should be ... should be applied to THEM ... THERE AND THEN ...
The "Attitude test" pass MAY help ... but not always ... GET OVER IT ...
My experience has proved ... it's worked more often than NOT ...
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
No, what I'm talking is the fact that cops simply let people past with no interference at all, hell we might not even see you or know that you measured our speed, if the speed, while technically illegally over the speed limit, is less than the current enforcement tolerance. No ticket, no warning, no nothing. Perhaps "discretion" is the wrong word. How do you describe this within the force?
Perhaps when you were consulting the interweb you should have looked under discretion in the Criminal Justice system.
There are several references to just giving a warning and not taking any action.
Don't take this the wrong way, but should a member of the Police have to use the interweb to get clarification on this?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks