I would be interesting to know what the reduction in funds collected for the ACC motorcycle group is and compare this against any reduction in the number and cost of bike related ACC claims for the same time. It might prove to be damming evidence that putting the ACC up actually cost the govt money.
I only have one modern registered bike, all the others are farm or vintage. I went on all the local Chch protest runs, went to Wellington (and helped out on the day) for the big protest and signed all the petitions, was even prepared to help with some of the civil disobedience protests that folk were talking about.
As a long term Ulysses and Hog member I do not believe they had the mandate to lobby on the ACC issue for all bikers. I did join BRONZ, who did have the mandate to act as a lobby group, but after being abused by the the prezy I told them to stick their membership where the sun don't shine.
Where did we go wrong? There was no published long term strategic plan, no buy in by the great unwashed and no review. BRONZ got very close but they were too well intentioned, did too much listening and not enough doing.
Let me ask you one thing. After being lied to by the government about the state of the ACC accounts and being used as a cash cow to bulk up the account, how many of you are still going to vote National at the election? Its ironic that many of us feel strongly enough about The ACC fiasco to back stab our fellow bikers for sport but not strongly enough to vote the buggers out of government.
We deserve what we got.
Bookmarks