Like those from not too distant Tea Ka-What-a who can't pronounce the name correctly![]()
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
Sure that's not your imagination?? Both the calculation of the calorific content of E10 (the 10% blend Ethanol/Petrol we use here) and actual studies all show an increased fuel usage of almost 1%. I'd be really surprised if you noticed that.
The main problem with E10 is how it affects a lot of components.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
I'm pretty sure the calorific value of E10 is about 3% less than regular petrol. This is supposedly also reflected in about a 3% reduction in range. I can't remember where I saw the calculations but I'll try find them. E10 is supposed to, however, yield approx 30% less hydrocarbon emissions.
BUT, you are correct in that the main issue with ethanol blends is the water that is absorbed and the corrosion it causes to parts not designed for it
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
I've kept records of gas consumption from day 1 with both of my last two bikes.
I've also compared range with E10 and "ordinary" 95 octane.
Any difference is academic - the way I ride the thing makes HEAPS more of a difference.
. “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks