My bet is PD before page 5. Just saying
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Did G actually profit from TM? It was set up, run and then sold by his son.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
The term registered owner was deleted coz the name a vehicle is registered to is not necessarily related to ownership. Lots of people own a vehicle and register it in someone elses name, for legitimate or other reasons. Like, a matt black Nissn Skyline with cut springs, fluffy dice, loud exhaust, tinted windows etc is probably the property of the 18 year old spotty faced irk, rather than his never-even-had-a-parking-ticket mother, to whom the vehicle is registered for insurance purposes.
So the term was changed to registered person to remove the impression that the person to whom a vehicle is registered actually owns it. Source was a legislation change a few months ago.
Reference
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regul...LM2938301.html
Just FYI.
I find this answer strangely informative. Must stop that.
yes. He got a big slice of the pie as his sons bankroller but as I can't find a reference please apply salt as desired.
With Wikipedia blackout had to use other sources. According to the Herald he gave away what he made from trademe
Originally Posted by http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10779656
Bah! Semantics. Fucken PC bullshit. Barring finance owing, the registered 'person' is still the registered 'owner'. Nothing changes. It's not as though the word 'owner' has the same connotations as 'nigger', for instance.
A sensible person would think that the pollies had more important stuff to deal with...but, obviously not. It takes time debating this crap.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks