When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Going by this link ... they may have authorisation to access the information.
http://www.transport.govt.nz/ourwork...hicleregister/
It would seem the "opt out" is not hard and fast ...
Anyone wishing to have access to names and addresses held on the Motor Vehicle Register after 1 May 2011 will have to apply for and obtain an “authorisation” from the Secretary for Transport.
The Secretary for Transport can issue an authorisation to any person to obtain current names and addresses. An authorisation may be for any purpose and subject to any conditions specified by the Secretary. It will be up to the applicant to make a persuasive case. An application may be valid for up to 5 years.
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Yes this is a section 241 authorisation. They arent hard to get, they have authorised hundreds of users.
http://www.dia.govt.nz/MSOS118/On-Li...pand=29.1#29.1
But, a section 241 is not supposed to supply information on opted out persons.
I think that a few OIA enquiries are going to bring to light some smelly rats.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
I couldnt see where it is allowed for the likes of Tournament/Wilsons parking to become an authorised person to obtain any information, let alone information on a person who has opted out. Unless they use an extremely broad definition of a "Financial Services Provider", which according to the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008, they wouldnt comply. Im very interested to see the outcome of this one.
Also in relation to the "liquidated damages" in the invoice they issued, what would have been the parking fee for the space that was occupied, assuming it was a full and complete car park that was taken and not some pokey little corner where they couldnt rent out the space to a car, because if it wasnt a car park that was taken up then you have not caused them any liquidated damages to my understanding but then again IANAL
There are two types of people in the world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data sets
Tournament have a section 241 authorisation.
http://www.dia.govt.nz/MSOS118/On-Li...t=0,tournament
But it shouldn't apply to anyone who has opted out.
I did an OIA request last year, and found the NZTA ignored the Opt Out, releasing the information in > 97% of cases. But The Opt out was only new, and it was a very small sample, only around 140 applications. I'm just working on a new OIA request to get the latest info, but will wait till we hear what they tell the OP.
Id encourage anyone who has opted out to ask them the hard questions.
But my experience with the NZTA is you have to be very careful how you ask. They are very good at giving you an answer that re-assures you without actually giving detail. And when you dig, the detail shows you were unwise to have been reassured !
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
Tournament's terms and conditions can be ignored.
No one can unilaterally impose a contract by way of a sign - and civil enforcement would be impossible.
Tournament would have to establish who the driver was, and the registered owner is under no obligation to tell them.
The only legal avenue for Tournament would be through the Disputes Tribunal with a $30 filing fee which they couldn't claim.
So Tournament won't take legal action and can't put anything on your credit rating.
Recommendation from various UK websites is to ignore them - acknowledge them in any way and you are on the hooked fish list.
I've ignored all "tickets" from shopping malls, as has everyone I know.
Thats interesting. The 241 authorisation allows Tournament "To send reminder notices to persons registered in respect of motor vehicles where vehicles have been parked in car parks managed by Tournament Parking in breach of the terms of a contract."
If you are correct that no contract exists, then they can't use a 241 exemption to get name and address data. On the other hand, the MOT are unlikely to care. They are apparently already releasing the name and address of opted out individuals even though the 241 makes it clear they may not.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
A Reminder Notice which means nothing.
If you don't reply to a Reminder Notice issued under the Summary Proceedings Act , it can be filed in a court as an unpaid "fine".
A Reminder Notice from Wilson or Tournament Parking is frankly toilet paper. No law has been broken, it could only be enforced through Civil Procedures, any semi decent defence would beat it in the very unlikely event proceedings were commenced.
Like debt collectors, Wilson Parking and Tournament Parking have no statutory powers, have a laugh at anything they send......and ignore it.
My terms and conditions which state Wilson Parking owe me $500 for every letter they send to me is as meaningless as the rubbish they send out.
Police and council tickets should be responded to, anything else should be treated with the contempt it deserves.
And in an attempt to get the fee's they are claiming ... a debt recovery company will be involved ...
I'm sure he will be happy about that too ...
Interesting reading ...
http://nzcms.co.nz/appeals_faq.html
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
IANAL but..... just because Tournament publish that stuff on the internet doesn't make it legally or factually correct. Its not as if they were the most reputable and upstanding of organisations now is it?
I would hope that at the very least they would need to prove that the party who committed this "breach of contract" was the registered owner.
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
Fuck me dead, people are starting to click on...
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
Ha..... I love this line
"TERMS & CONDITIONS OF PARKING
BY ENTERING THIS CAR PARK YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS & CONDITIONS SET OUT BELOW. IF YOU DO NOT ACCEPT THESE TERMS & CONDITIONS, IMMEDIATELY LEAVE THE CAR PARK. THESE TERMS & CONDITIONS APPLY FROM WHEN YOU DRIVE YOUR VEHICLE INTO THIS CAR PARK AND APPLY 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. YOU HEREBY ALSO BIND THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE YOU ARE DRIVING TO ALL OF THESE TERMS & CONDITIONS AND WARRANT YOUR AUTHORITY TO DO SO."
I'm sure it just that easy!!![]()
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks