oh and for me one critical little 'aside'.... bias!!
I do enjoy reading road tests where a group with different preferences ride 2-3 bikes over a weekend 'fang'. What I dont enjoy is Peter Penishead who is only interested in the latest Ichifanni XBRZ1200 CCIEXUP turbo, deciding that as it doesnt fit his 'bias' its a pile of shit. Lets have reviewer who will give HONEST appraisal of any bike. Example it may be a Boulevard ridden by an R1 preference tester, but at least have riders who can evaluate the cycle for what it is....
I agree with Martybabes thoughts on 'sweetner reviews that are really sponsored? sales pitches.......
lets also have a few reviews and 'shootouts' where sometimes a group of (example) modern sports tourers like the Kawasaki Concours etc may well find a 'venerable' classic like an FJ/ZZR/CBR/RF/GS among them... we dont/wouldnt expect to read how amazing the new/old ones are per se... but it would be good information to see in real terms how things have progressed and where, as well as to see in 'real use' terms how small/big the gap between them is.........
If the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and a man is judged by his deeds and his actions, why say it's the thought that counts? -GrayWolf
Bookmarks