Insurance without WOF

[onearmedbandit]

Oh fuck off knobjockey.

I should infract you for that insult. But I'll wait until a knobjockey complains about the comparison.

[nodrog:Me]

I should infract you for that insult. But I'll wait until a knobjockey complains about the comparison.

You are right, I apologise to all the Knobjockeys out there who dont want to be associated with a dipshit icecream salesman.

[Oscar]

Whut? The laws of contract, tort, etc are the whole basis of common law, and statutes of parliament are tantamount to "rules that we pulled out of our arse".

Kindly quote your sources.

Connotation 1 distinguishes the authority that promulgated a law. For example, most areas of law in most Anglo-American jurisdictions include "statutory law" enacted by a legislature, "regulatory law" promulgated by executive branch agencies pursuant to delegation of rule-making authority from the legislature, and common law or "case law", i.e., decisions issued by courts (or quasi-judicial tribunals within agencies).[10][11] This first connotation can be further differentiated into (a) pure common law arising from the traditional and inherent authority of courts to define what the law is, even in absence of an underlying statute, e.g., most criminal law and procedural law before the 20th century, and even today, most of contract law and the law of torts, and (b) court decisions that interpret and decide the fine boundaries and distinctions in law promulgated by other bodies. This body of common law, sometimes called "interstitial common law," includes judicial interpretations of the Constitution, of statutes, and of regulations, and examples of application of law to facts.[12]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_...regulatory_law

Read my post again.
There is nothing in an insurance policy that overrides common law or legislation or statue or sharia fucking law. My source is any contract of insurance.

[Akzle]

There is nothing in an insurance policy that overrides common law or legislation or statue or sharia fucking law. My source is any contract of insurance.

i never said it DID, only that it COULDN'T.

sounds like you know a thing or two DB. glad i'm not the only one awake

[FJRider]

A comma sometimes makes all the difference.

Is that in "Comma Law" ... ???

[Oscar]

i never said it DID, only that it COULDN'T.

sounds like you know a thing or two DB. glad i'm not the only one awake

I wasn't talking to you.
I didn't want to distract you from saving NZ.

[Matt_TG]

Insurance Law Reform Act 1977, Section 11 is all you need to know, sleemanj nailed it in post 6 & 8.

Of course it wouldn't be a KB way to end the week without robust armchair expert discussion

Being involved in the industry for 14 years as a Chartered Loss Adjuster, the first Insurance Institute exam I sat covered the ramifications of the Act. Honestly it's not a secret.

[Akzle]

Oscar
Curmudgeon
♂
Join Date:
19th August 2003 - 15:32
Bike:
KTM 950Adv BMW R80G/S Yamaha XT500
Location:
In a state of denial...
Posts:
2,699

yurp. i'd say so.
but who ever said i was trying to save what you call NZ? what do you call NZ?

Oh fuck off knobjockey.

Do you sell ice creams?

rest your right hand from its Oananist duties

seriously guys. my five year old daughter probably couldn't spell "argument" but would put up a better one that.

why are you so offended by the facts? that y'all feel the need to resort to politicians-tactics? (that would be, entering childing namecalling without adressing the issues at hand)

[cs363]

Do you sell ice creams?

[cs363]

I think you'll find it's still correct, Poindextor.

Correction Oscar - it's Poindexter (http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...erm=poindexter)

Otherwise, as you were - it's always fun watching 'experts' argue with experts.

[Pussy]

i never said it DID, only that it COULDN'T.

sounds like you know a thing or two DB. glad i'm not the only one awake

Peckerhead DB with another login.....

[rastuscat]

a big negative buddy.
common, as defined in a blacks' law dictionary (the kind that they use when writing legislation), is defined as having the UNIVERSAL ASSENT of the people.

the legislation that the monkeys in the beehive pump out is not common law, it is statute law, or legislation.
for one, it does not have MY consent OR assent. for twosies, i'm sure lots of people drive at 120km/h, or more, that seems to be the will of the people, instead of having the common right to do that, we have POLICy Enforcers, threatening us with tasers and glocks to comply with the statute law, and only travel at 100km/h


here's a bouviers law dictionary:
"COMMON LAW. That which derives its force and authority from the universal
consent and immemorial practice of the people."



what an insurance company chooses to do in any given circumstance is up to them, it was a simple fact that legally (by legislation) a private contract cannot overrule or superceed the legislation applicable to the jurisdiction under which it was made.

with me champ? grab a law dictionary and sift through legislation.govt.nz, you may surprise yourself.
and if you're interested, check out http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/thema...timebomb.shtml - the govt that's issuing this legislation and enFORCE-ing it on us, is actually illegal.

Awesome. Always good to have yet another KBer that knows everything.

Suggest you take a few deep breaths before you start alienating the longer serving members. Knob.

[pritch]

Bob Jones used to write a column that appeared in most newspapers around the country. His comments would often upset people, most likely intentionally.

I seem to recall that he observed that the standard of correspondence deteriorated around the full moon, but invariably the most off-the-wall psychotic ramblings were written in green ink.

[cs363]

Bob Jones used to write a column that appeared in most newspapers around the country. His comments would often upset people, most likely intentionally.

I seem to recall that he observed that the standard of correspondence deteriorated around the full moon, but invariably the most off-the-wall psychotic ramblings were written in green ink.

And not unusually, he'd be correct - it's a worldwide phenomenon, though first observed in Britain by all accounts: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Green_ink

[Oscar]

Correction Oscar - it's Poindexter (http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...erm=poindexter)

Otherwise, as you were - it's always fun watching 'experts' argue with experts.

Thanks Mate.
Only on KB would a discussion about insurance turn into a rant about the legitimacy of our Gummint.


Ps. Wanna buy a K1?