Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 121

Thread: Suzuki M50 vs Harley 883 Iron

  1. #91
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,415
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    dunno what your on about, i have no mates, ride alone, and ride a cruiser way over 140km/hr
    of course you do.
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  2. #92
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,415
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post
    Darn - that's an unfortunate typo..... HDC
    what makes you think it was a typo?
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  3. #93
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    Costs about $1500.00, depending on model year. A 1200 kitted 883, will then actually go better than a 1200.
    Why ?

  4. #94
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    Why ?
    The 883 heads have a smaller combustion chamber, so they run at a higher compression ratio. They also have diff size ports and create better intake velocity.
    Last edited by Crasherfromwayback; 31st May 2012 at 11:16. Reason: Can't spell

  5. #95
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase View Post
    because some of us think with our branes, not our testicles, and are unconcerned what our "mates" think. Some of us have been there and done that and had the t shirt so long we are using it as a polishing rag in our garage full of all different sort of bikes. Some of us dont like to go hard on the road any more due to the unsporting nature of the rules around getting caught doing over 140kph "speeding" (in first or second gear). Some of us want to take our significant others out for a pootle on a ride where they are comfortable, and can look at the scenery, some like to "prove" how big their nads are by actually racing. Some like to do trackdays.

    Different strokes for different folks: Who do you think you are to criticise anyone's choice?
    Also, you can ride a fast motorbike slow....

    IMO a bike needs to have a get up and go. You can have all the torque you want, you have a big torque cakewalk right through the middle of Tienamen Square and it won't make a lick of difference, because a nice powerful engine is one of the best things about riding.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,415
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    Also, you can ride a fast motorbike slow....

    IMO a bike needs to have a get up and go. You can have all the torque you want, you have a big torque cakewalk right through the middle of Tienamen Square and it won't make a lick of difference, because a nice powerful engine is one of the best things about riding.
    hilarious: what do you think torque IS, numbnuts?
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  7. #97
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase View Post
    hilarious: what do you think torque IS, numbnuts?
    (5252*hp)/RPM = Torque. ;-P

    Heres the kicker, people always go "it dosent have much HP, but man the torque is AWESOME"

    But I've always said, Why not have both.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,415
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    (5252*hp)/RPM = Torque. ;-P

    Heres the kicker, people always go "it dosent have much HP, but man the torque is AWESOME"

    But I've always said, Why not have both.
    horsepower is an abstraction: the relationship is torques and rpm: which is why the curves always cross at 5250rpm (its to do with the magic and stuff) so what you're doing is confusing rpm and torque (or something: will a mechanical engineer please help me out here!??!).
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  9. #99
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase View Post
    horsepower is an abstraction: the relationship is torques and rpm: which is why the curves always cross at 5250rpm (its to do with the magic and stuff) so what you're doing is confusing rpm and torque (or something: will a mechanical engineer please help me out here!??!).
    The 5252 comes in to convert the units (its used when using the ft-lbs measurement).

    Consider this (figures 100% made up maybe wont workout in an equation?)

    bike 1 - 60hp @ 5000 RPM, 80ft0lbs torque @ 3400 RPM

    bike 2 - 100hp @ 6000 RPM, 80ft0lbs torque @ 3800 RPM

    Which one is faster?

  10. #100
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,415
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    The 5252 comes in to convert the units (its used when using the ft-lbs measurement).

    Consider this (figures 100% made up maybe wont workout in an equation?)

    bike 1 - 60hp @ 5000 RPM, 80ft0lbs torque @ 3400 RPM

    bike 2 - 100hp @ 6000 RPM, 80ft0lbs torque @ 3800 RPM

    Which one is faster?
    What is "faster" in this context? 0-10mph? 0-60 mph? 0-100mph? absolute top speed? rollon from 50-80mph?

    what does each one weigh with rider? how is each one geared? does one have aerodynamic aids and one not?

    I gett he feeling we are talking past each other, and I am not confident enough in my grasp of this stuff to give you the seeing-to that you richly seem to deserve. Though there is a possibility I am talking out my arse too.
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  11. #101
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryDorsetCase View Post
    What is "faster" in this context? 0-10mph? 0-60 mph? 0-100mph? absolute top speed? rollon from 50-80mph?

    what does each one weigh with rider? how is each one geared? does one have aerodynamic aids and one not?

    I gett he feeling we are talking past each other, and I am not confident enough in my grasp of this stuff to give you the seeing-to that you richly seem to deserve. Though there is a possibility I am talking out my arse too.

    All im saying is, a more power engine is better.

  12. #102
    Join Date
    21st January 2010 - 12:21
    Bike
    The Black Pearl
    Location
    Vegas Az
    Posts
    1,468
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    All im saying is, a more power engine is better.
    Oh brother!
    Keep on chooglin'

  13. #103
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Quote Originally Posted by Smifffy View Post
    Oh brother!
    well its like when you compare a honda to a hyosung.

    Its apples and pairs.

  14. #104
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    [QUOTE=renegade master;1130333565]well its like when you compare a honda to a hyosung.
    QUOTE]

    Hyosung are the new gay.......

  15. #105
    Join Date
    12th September 2009 - 16:14
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,750
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    a more power engine is better.
    Because racebike.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •