Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 72 of 72

Thread: Bikes getting too sick?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    19th October 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    1998 suzuki RG150e (AETC)... X2
    Location
    Canterbury University
    Posts
    427
    Quote Originally Posted by oldfart
    Sounds like Roger Freeth's RG500. Around 76-77 he worked out the aerodynamic design of Aerofoils required to produce more down force on the bike. THey were considered dangerous, (yet more feckin bureaucratic dip shittery). Next season, factory RG's that Sheene & co were riding appeared with aerofoils built into the fairing.
    Thats him, i dunno about the bike though, but it had a big fat 1 on the front...
    Last edited by ZorsT; 2nd August 2005 at 21:33. Reason: tyupo
    I suffer from hooliganism.... Know me before you judge me
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...7&postcount=83
    i need to practice my "this shit doesn't burn" face
    Welcome, ZorsT.
    You last visited: 1st November 2007 at 22:15

  2. #62
    Join Date
    20th August 2004 - 13:16
    Bike
    XZ10R 2006
    Location
    lost
    Posts
    617
    I just love the instant power of the ZX10r, just going back to
    The current loner bike a Humble old nt650 bros feels
    like i have had something removed.
    It just feels so much slower (witch it is)
    but it is deceptive, its so much slower reving i wind up speeding more.
    and the riding pos feels like crap.
    even round town the ZX10 just feels more planted
    i just feel more at home on it, sure it has power to spare
    but you do not have to use it
    (christ i will wear out third gear before any other)
    when i ride to work i arrive with a big grin, and look forward to riding
    home again knowing i can just walk out and jump on
    one of the most fun,mental,exciting,deadly,exceptional, kick arse bikes
    I have ever ridden
    (ps if you want fun just get a motorway onramp to yourself and wack
    the throttle open in first, its like everyone just beemed of the planet, just do not try this in the wet)
    the art of diplomacy is saying nice doggie,
    until you find a big rock

  3. #63
    Join Date
    13th March 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    1995 Kawasaki GPZ500s
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    101
    Roger Freeth was around the top of the m/cycling seen late 70's, early 80's. Was a real bright guy, professor in maths & could apply this in real life. Had the nick name super frog when trialing yet another of his experiments, he tried to lower the centre of gravity by lowering the seat height. Trouble was, Freeth was 6' + so his legs stuck out. Died in a car crash co-driving/navigator with Possum Bourne
    It is better to have ridden & crashed than never to have ridden at all

  4. #64
    Join Date
    27th July 2004 - 00:36
    Bike
    NC700X XR250 MTS1200
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    3,275
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyB
    Rode a GSXR1000K4 a while back. Even though I ride a good example of what was once the cutting edge 1000 sports bike, I was having to really work at it to keep the thing down to 120ish. There was just no sensation of speed.

    I didn't ride it hard but I suspect that you can't actually 'use' the first two gears due to it's tendency to want to point the front wheel skywards (if you're a skinny runt like me). Once you hit third you can explore the upper end of the tacho, but by then you're at "gimme your license and walk home" speeds. I have always thought the more power the better, because you can ride quickly without stressing the engine, but I wonder if a level has been reached where there's not much point in going any further. My short ride on this bike had me thinking that perhaps a GSXR750 is a more useable option?

    Having said that, I know that this subject has come up everytime a faster bike comes out, and it will continue to do so, and we will continue to demand more.
    at the moment I am thinking if my GXSR750 is too much for me either..... its just so fast... and you don't feel the speed...
    newbie since August 2004....
    VTR250 (retired) / SV650S (Fw:Keystone19) / GSXR750(given up) / CB400(traded for 919) / CB900 Hornet / CBR954 (traded) / CBR1100XX (sold) / TuonoR (sold) / CB900 Hornet / NC700X / MTS1200 / XR250

  5. #65
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,499
    Blog Entries
    140
    This post will most likely reflect on my age, but I do consider myself quite disciplined.

    But when hitting a long straight, I simply can't help myself wanting to "open err up". Also coming out of corners. The biggest diff from a 250 would be the ability to howl up a hill whenever I like...

    I can't wait to begin moving up, obviously it wouldn't be a round 1000 initially, probably 400-600. For me it is not a case of bragging or showing off, its all about enjoying myself. Sadly (license wise) I really enjoy going quicker and quicker (without being stupid tho)

    Quote Originally Posted by BJ
    You can loose your lisence with a 250.. it's just not as fun.. My 636 will pull 107kph in first. I've got 5 more gears. The thous do even more! What's the point when you can get points on your lisence without changing gear?
    I simply love this point... kinda scary tho, gears are no longer needed eh?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
    It's barking mad and if it doesn't turn you into a complete loon within half an hour of cocking a leg over the lofty 875mm seat height, I'll eat my Arai.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    3rd July 2005 - 22:03
    Bike
    2005 ZX6R
    Location
    New Zealandish
    Posts
    336
    I've been thinking about this. With my 150 I can rev it to the red and blast the pedestrians with the screams of the engine and not worry about cops because I shouldn't break the speed limit too much in 3rd gear (about 80kmph max). The bigger the bike the more docile you have to be. plus the 150 is never gonna loose traction from pure acceleration.


    You can thrash the bike and do it in reasonable safely.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    1st September 2004 - 12:38
    Bike
    Ducati M750/ MotoFXR
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    2,448
    Quote Originally Posted by Pathos
    You can thrash the bike and do it in reasonable safely.
    Some of us enjoy that, and some of us get sick of it. I'm one of the latter group.

    I rode a mates 89 EVO summat once- it put a smile on my face for the first few minutes because it just made such a performance of everything it did- bellowing when it accelerated, viabrating & bouncing along. It was a hoot... for about five minutes. Then I realised that despite giving it arseholes for three or four gears it was only doing 120k. It had no ground clearance and THE most appaling brakes I have ever had the misfortune to use. It viabrated so badly I couldn't keep my feet still on the foot boards, they floated around and every now and then one would float off the edge! It thought it was going real fast at 130k's.

    I can see why some people love them so much- they make it feel like you're going fast when you're not. I personally would get sick of that real quick- I expect a bike to actually DO what it's 'telling' me it's doing.
    My daughter telling me like it is:
    "There is an old man in your face daddy!"

  8. #68
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyB
    I personally would get sick of that real quick- I expect a bike to actually DO what it's 'telling' me it's doing.

    And just for argument's sake -
    What about society telling you 'you should only DO 100kph'?
    Where does a 300kph screamer fit into that telling mentality?

  9. #69
    Join Date
    24th September 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    '76 CB550 Super Sport
    Location
    On the road to nowhere...
    Posts
    7,414
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
    ??

    Well looks are subjective things eh! I reckon the W650 is a really nicely proportioned bike and has pure lines. The new Bonnie is cursed with a fugly engine and exhaust pipes but thats just my opinion.....

    Oh well, ya pays ya money!
    Pesonnaly I agree with your opinion. But we all know BD is a trumpy sock puppet who will try to push the party line at every opportunity

  10. #70
    Join Date
    24th September 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    '76 CB550 Super Sport
    Location
    On the road to nowhere...
    Posts
    7,414
    You do certainly have a good point of topic in this thread Dave. It's one reason I've had the CB750FC2 for 19 years, same with the '76 CB550, '81 GSX750-which will wipe it's ass with the new Bonnies btw, certainly of similar build quality and it's 24 years old Also one reason I bought my GB400-to quote an ANZA salesman-"Is all the m/c a rider needs" apperently he toured the South Island on his and now has a GB500 as in his stable with his so called Brit "classics"

    PS-wished dad had never sold the 500 Ariel twin or C15 BSA single.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    14th February 2005 - 17:33
    Bike
    .
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,718
    big bikes arent MEANT to go past 100 of course.
    you just buy them to look cool


    I mean

    isnt that why you ride a bike?
    I only posted this because of the global economic crisis

  12. #72
    Join Date
    24th September 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    '76 CB550 Super Sport
    Location
    On the road to nowhere...
    Posts
    7,414
    Quote Originally Posted by pyrocam
    big bikes arent MEANT to go past 100 of course.
    you just buy them to look cool


    I mean

    isnt that why you ride a bike?
    I thought the spelling was KEWL Oh and past a hundred whats?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •