Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 91 to 97 of 97

Thread: Can 3 bikes get clocked by radar?

  1. #91
    Join Date
    9th May 2011 - 11:33
    Bike
    Repsol something or other
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    806
    Cheers for the feedback guys, was genuinely curious.

    As said before, everyone speeds, getting caught is just a matter of when.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Quote Originally Posted by baffa View Post

    As said before, everyone speeds, getting caught is just a matter of when.
    Try telling THAT to the rest of KB...
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

  3. #93
    Join Date
    7th December 2006 - 16:05
    Bike
    RF900
    Location
    Varies
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Muppet View Post
    Said it before on this thread, I'll say it again..."This is quite entertaining watching all you armchair experts/bush lawyers talk about something you a) aren't trained to use b) aren't certified to use and c) have no experience in using".

    Akzle, you should be a biking agony aunt.....

    "Dear Akzle,

    the other day the police got me for speeding again help!

    Yours, Buggered."



    "Dear Buggered,

    if the cops weren't wearing their hats, they have to pay you compensation.

    Akzle"
    Dunno about armchair expert... Would you consider someone who operated radar on a surface-to-air missile system and went on to become second-in-command of a whole sector an armchair expert? I am not rated to operate your typical popo radar, but I certainly feel qualified enough to comment on the inherent shortcomings of such a system. And besides, I'm a pompous prick, so I can comment on whatever I like.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    5th December 2009 - 12:32
    Bike
    Yes
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    3,284
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans View Post
    Dunno about armchair expert... Would you consider someone who operated radar on a surface-to-air missile system and went on to become second-in-command of a whole sector an armchair expert? I am not rated to operate your typical popo radar, but I certainly feel qualified enough to comment on the inherent shortcomings of such a system.
    I used to have a laser pointer on a key ring.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    13th July 2008 - 20:48
    Bike
    S1000XR
    Location
    Hanmer Springs
    Posts
    4,794
    Quote Originally Posted by Berries View Post
    I used to have a laser pointer on a key ring.
    You are qualified.

    Comment.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    22nd November 2008 - 18:09
    Bike
    CB750
    Location
    dunners
    Posts
    745
    Quote Originally Posted by rastuscat View Post
    You are qualified.

    Comment.
    Id say over qualified

  7. #97
    Join Date
    11th June 2006 - 15:52
    Bike
    Suzuki GSX1250FA, TGB 50cc moped
    Location
    Horowhenua
    Posts
    1,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans View Post
    The radar first gets it's own speed by getting a reading off a stationary object (it needs to be dead ahead of the vehicle), then it takes a reading of the closing speed of the popo car and you, then it subtracts it's own speed from the closing speed to get your speed. This is where the problem is:
    The cosine effect that was in your favour is now against you. If the own speed reading is taken off something that's not dead ahead, then it under-reads. That makes your displayed speed read high, and you're nicked, sunshine.
    The worst case is when the returned signal is from a moving vehicle in front of the patrol car. The patrol car speed is not correctly recorded, the closing speed on the vehicle in front is used thus severely inflating the calculated speed for the approaching vehicle.

    Many have said that speed camera radar error caused by a target vehicle not traveling toward the camera at the calculated angle is negligible.

    Its actually a worse case of 8%, for a camera at a design slant of 22.5 degrees, which I'm told is what we use.

    The camera would have to be severely misaligned for this to occur, or the camera would have to poorly sited on a corner, or the vehicle would have be changing lanes quickly etc.

    I accept its not likely, but its still entirely possible, and its not completely acceptable in my view to discount the possibility.
    David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •