If Kawasakis are reliable, then how good is Honda?
If you can make it on Kiwibiker you can make it anywhere.
The last Honda I owned was a 1981 model I think. I sincerely believe that they have greatly improved their engineering since then. My last Suzuki was even earlier than that. I can tell you though that at that time the Kwakas packed more power per cc, were more reliable, had better electrical systems, and were just better engineered in everything I looked at including ease of servicing. I think they have always been marketed less agressively. Nowdays, I think all the major brands are pretty good.
I do find it interesting though that Honda, Suzuki and Yamaha basically make nearly all their money from motor vehicles. With Kawasaki it seems to be a minor offshoot of enthusiasts who associate with the aviation industry. You can see this in some of their engineering.
Incidently, Kawasaki hold a number of contracts for the Japanese military. One of them is for supply of a long range recconaisance aircraft to fullfill the role previously played by US supplied Orion P3s. A review showed that it beat the Orion on every point of evaluation. What I can't understand is why Japan has made no attempt to manufacture these for export. Again - typical Kawasaki.
You want some advice - lightning strikes once, it does not strike twice!
I guess that would explain it. The Kawasaki aircraft involved here though is mainly being used for long range search & rescue work. It sounds like a little honey of a machine which would sell very well to most countries if they ever get the OK. The Orions are a very old design now.
Kawasaki seem to have had a long history of getting themselves in to funny corners like this with aircraft and with motorcycles! Lockheed Martin (think Skunk Works!) are another interesting company with their new developments.
Fairytales are the domain of infants ... Dreams are the stuff of progress.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks