Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
The system already has provision for vehicles that don't pay ACC levies on fuel, so no change there, although of course the owners of those vehicles may actually be better off with a fuel based levy. So LPG, diesel, electric, ethanol already has a solution in place and working. In fact a project to modernise (increase prices ?) has just been completed by the NZTA.
But even if it were not already in place, there is no problem with electric vehicles. Within a couple of years most homes will have smart meters - so every appliance including your car can potentailly be charged at a different rate.
Third party insurance regularly finds its way to the table and is lauged off, basically because it has no advantages.
(1) We already have higher rates of insurance than most countries that require it.
(2) Our Insurance is voluntary, thus is cheaper.
(3) Even if you only have thrid party, most insurance companies will pay for damage to your vehicle if you can identify the at fault party. My cover is for full value, but even AA offer $4K of cover this way.
So if YOU have third party cover, you dont need to wory about the other chap anyway.
(4) Payout rates drop under compulsory schemes as everyone disputes everything
Anyway its all a diversion.
MOT have put fuel based taxes on the table. With support from a wide section of NZ they will have to consider them. In this case we have to remember we will still be on our side of the table after the election. This government may not. MOT will listen just not very well.
RUCs are very fair, but they havent been offered as an option, and it may be harder to get them there.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
This was look at in the previous Safer Journeys submissions. It turned out that 95% of the vehicles on the road were already insured. Something like 4.9% of the remainder were not insurable (drive had been disqualified, vehicle ordered off road, etc). So compulsory insurance would only affect .1% of the vehicles.
Then they looked at the cost of implementing such a scheme to force those 0.1% of vehicles to get insurance, and it turned out everything was going to be paying more to run the scheme, and the benefit from the scheme was minimal. So the idea was scraped.
I generally support a 100% fuel based levy, but you have to remember changes to the law can stay in force for decades sometimes. Now with this in mind, consider the increasing likelihood of their being vehicles that don't need fuel (e,g. electric) - meaning they would bypass the levy, and the increasing chances of vehicles becoming more and more fuel efficient - which would necessitate the need for fuel price levy increases as the same amount of money still needs to be collected.
Humbling words said there John I must say.....
We put together four protest rides in the Auckland area from late 09' and the months following.
We were trying to gauge the level of support with the issue/s at hand.
With each ride, the numbers got less and less....from 360 bikes on the first ride to less the 100 by the last.
There were thousands of tree huggers (and like minded people) ..THOUSANDS! marching up Queen st the same day as our last protest ride.
We had to wait for the until the marching was well clear...we were hardly noticed at all, unlike the first blast up Q/st some months prior.
On that occassion, we bike cops at intersections and lot of bystanders taking pictures.
Honestly, I could understand the dwindling support of said rides, which is why the next phase of the 'movement' seemed such a great idea.
What I learned from the whole excerise was, you dont need anything like what we had going....
All you need is 'Support from like minded People'...(the public)...bikers alone dont have the numbers.
Not every mining protester is a miner right?....
They are the public who want to say NO and have had enough of being dictated to time and time again.
This 'Vehicle license reform' involves all road users, not just bikers
I wonder if bikers would get out and support car enthusiasts if they decide to do something about it?
So is anyone actually going to do anything? cause if so, as long as its on the north island, I'm in!
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks