Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Radar detector signal interpretation

  1. #31
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion
    I wnder why it is that the sweet spot on almost every bike seems to be just fast enough to risk tickets.
    It's because we have such a pathetically low Tax threshold (speed limit) compared to other countries

  2. #32
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by ducatijim
    Large Ag tractors have ground sensing radar fitted to them as a rule these days,I don't know what band, but they trigger a half strength alert on my Valeintine1 @ over 600m. The signal does not grow stronger as you close the gap however. So watch out for 'falses' from these machines now the new season is getting underway and you will see more of them on the roads.
    This isn't a radar device.It's the Safety Warning System (SWS) transmitter that is used In the US.NZ police were offered it for free by the manufacturer,but felt that it's safety advantages were a lower priority than the fact that it would promote radar detector use (which receive the signals) and therefore reduce revenue.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by RiderInBlack

    111KPM in a 100KPM zone. Just me on a wet day down the Ruakaka/Waipu Straights. What can I say cop was having a bad day, so I cheered him up a bit

    124KPM in a 100kpm zone (again). Yep, 80L backpack (yada, yada, yada). Bloody Ngatea Straights (which is why I travel by Matamata going to Tauranga).
    Cop "You didn't slow down for me in a hurry"
    Having seen him K's up the road but too late to do anything about it I replyed:
    "Well I could see that you had me, so I felt there was not point in hurting myself by braking too hard just to stop for you"

    The bike would have to be pretty gutless before I wouldn't get done for over the 100KPM, and I wouldn't want to ride it anyway
    At 124 km per minute, I'd say you got off lightly. Where did you get the JATO packs to enable that sort of speed?
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    27th September 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    "Bagheera" GSX1400K5
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    2,876
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
    At 124 km per minute, I'd say you got off lightly. Where did you get the JATO packs to enable that sort of speed?
    From the "Mr Fusion" unit I fitted after getting back from the future of course Bloody smartarse. I'm surprise you didn't ask where the 100KPM Zone was Edited it now.
    New Zealand......
    The Best Place in the World to live if ya Broke


    "Whole life balance, Daniel-San" ("Karate Kid")

    Kia kaha, kia toa, kia manawanui ( Be strong, be brave, be steadfast and sure)
    DON'T RIDE LIKE YA STOLE IT, RIDE TO SURVIVE.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    30th October 2003 - 21:46
    Bike
    TL1000S , XB12R
    Location
    Napier, New Zealand
    Posts
    431
    Quote Originally Posted by Bykey Cop
    haha, the Tui's ad comes to mind.

    You are right though, you have to have a visual on the car before confirming which vehicle is doing that speed... it is just helpful when the radar starts picking up speeds around a bend... you then have your "trigger" finger ready to lock on the speed when vehicle comes into view.

    BC
    Surely the laws of physics have not changed , a car coming at you from an angle would look substantialy slower to the radar than its actual speed due to the angle and the fact that radar works by working out the rate of closing distance. If a car showed as speeding it would need to be going pretty fast and the actual speed would depend on the angle of the bend. When I am bored I may drag out my old physics text books and work this one out.
    But sure as eggs a good detector will have seen you too.

    As for the false alarms , the uniden detectors will set off a sensitive bel or escort, sometimes from quite a distance, good detectors dont set each other off.

    Also the older Valentines are not quite as sensitive as the old 980 bel and escort so do not seem to suffer the falsing from unidens.

    Dave

  6. #36
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    That's called cosine error, and it works in the cops favour if he's in the bend and you're on the straight.
    BTW falsing isn't a function of sensitivity, it's inadequate filtering in the gubbins. (another technical term)
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •