Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Hard vs soft luggage

  1. #16
    Join Date
    18th August 2008 - 10:43
    Bike
    690 Advenduro
    Location
    Devonparty
    Posts
    1,204
    I much prefer soft luggage purely because it is lighter (not that I have ever run hard luggage, but the weight puts me off).

    Just that gear security issue.

    If you want to come around and have a look at the setup I have for my 690 feel free to give me a shout.


  2. #17
    Join Date
    16th July 2008 - 20:36
    Bike
    92 R80 GS
    Location
    NEW PLYMOUTH
    Posts
    804
    I have both. I have had Touratech Panniers on the BMW for years. I used soft panniers for the TAT and glad I did. I would have wrecked the hard panniers on a trip like that. ( if you come off they will bend/break ) In the last few days on the TAT we rode at times with a German guy who had hard panniers. We had the discussion about catching your leg on them. A couple of days later we got to the bottom of some tricky stuff and waited for him. He took quite a while to arrive and guess what ? Had fallen off and got his leg pinned under a pannier and couldnt move. He finally got out. Leg not broken but real sore.
    Having said that I have just finished fitting the Hard panniers to the DR for an up coming South Island trip, although I dont expect any real tough riding.
    So horses for courses.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •