ALWAYS expect the unexpected on the road cos people do some crazy shit out there.
Perhaps it's not legal but it's still done and should be expected, you can't necessarily see if he is trying to avoid something with him in the way. I have, on a number of occasions done it myself in the cage as a way to tell the guy behind he was way too close. (even better was the bluebird I had had the reverse lights on a switch, great fun at lights when the guy behind has been tailgating)
A couple of months ago I slowed to walking pace down qe2 Dr because some old guy in a commodore was following incredibly close, he got between me and the learner in front and rode his rear tyre until I got in between them and forced him to slow down or run me over. This affected my friends confidence on the day (which happened to be his first decent ride, luckily we were on the way home or he could have ruined a good ride)
Sent from my XT535 using Tapatalk 2
No argument there. New bike's great for riding around problems. With the GN I was stuck with whatever was in front on the motorway. A colleague was nearly killed last Friday when a car decided to change lanes with no warning. Caused her to smack into the barrier and the other car just floored it out of there. Must have been drunk or unlicenced or just a w*nker.
"This is not a car."
That seems to be the subject of this thread, blaming the most basic bike on the road for having basic brakes and using it as an excuse for dropping them.
If you got shit brakes, take that into account when you decide your following distance or you deserve to wind up on your ass.
(Darwins theory at work?)
Sent from my XT535 using Tapatalk 2
Yes and no. I'm not a great rider, I admit that, but a better braked bike probably would have stopped in time and upright. Yes, it turns out I was following too closely - hence the accident. Don't really understand your motivation for your post except to make me feel worse.![]()
"This is not a car."
Again, not really helpful. Accidents are unintended incidents and we all have them. Hindsight's awesome. I hope you don't end up on your arse when YOU make a mistake. I'd never wish that on anyone or believe they deserve an accident.
If you've seen any of my posts you'll see I have lots of praise for GNs. Doesn't change that they have shit brakes and poor stability under braking. Fact. Perhaps only riders with godlike riding prowess and an ability to foresee and prevent accidents through their own awesomeness should ride GNs?
"This is not a car."
I want an '82 front end on mine, because it has the drum. Sexy.
The brakes do feel shit and they do lock up pretty well on small angles, but with practise one can haul a GN up relatively fast (until they start fading...)
Sadly, humans do panick, especially new to riding ones
Stop being right damn you.
Sent from the bush by your window using a flick of the wrist
Yeah, they do. I owned one for a year and NEVER felt good about the brakes. Over that 30 year period how many accidents might have been prevented by better parts and brakes? Every other bike I've ridden has been much better.
HOWEVER!!!!!!
I w-a-s f-o-l-l-o-w-i-n-g t-o-o c-l-o-s-e f-o-r t-h-e b-r-a-k-e-s t-h-a-t c-a-m-e w-i-t-h m-y f-o-r-m-e-r b-i-k-e, h-e-n-c-e m-y a-c-c-i-d-e-n-t.
I was completely at fault and I am a bad rider. Happy?
"This is not a car."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks