"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
The one I read said that introducing speed limits had increased NT accident rates, it compared NT to the rest of Au, where they'd reduced.
That's historically been the case pretty much every time such changes have been made.
But faced with simple facts there'll always be people who don't like the logical implication, and manage to find facts to support their own opinion.
Nowt wrong with that, it's human.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
id have to dig through the hd to find the dash cam footage of dickheads having near misses passing the trucks in the NT..
its not the speed that kills, its the people who cannot drive to the conditon's of the road and also the condition of there
vehicle..
We all know speed doesn't kill. I am surprised people don't accept the simple physics put up my Mr Trousers though that the faster you go the quicker things happen if something does go wrong.
Anyway, ten bucks says the NT government don't go back and lift the speed limits again.
Haven't seen anyone deny it.
Neither have I seen anyone deny that in most cases fewer accidents occur where there's either no speed limits or where the limits are higher.
So, which is the stronger juju, given that there's also fewer fatalities where there's more liberal speed compliance?
Which implies central and local govt might ignore pertinent data when setting policy. Really?![]()
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
If you threw driving standards in to that mix I'd agree with you. No speed limits, higher limits or liberal compliance is fine if supported by decent driving standards on decent roads. If you take NZ as an example, I don't think we have the decent roads, let alone decent drivers, to lift the speed limit too far. More like India than any European country I've been to.
I don't think it's rocket science that hitting an object at 80kph is going to hurt less than hitting an object at 120 kph. The trick is to not hit anything in the first place. Average dual carriageway speed here is about 130 kph and when they do have crashes they are pretty bad.
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
It wasn't an opinion, dude, it's verifiable fact. Wherever speed restrictions are introduced or made more restrictive accidents increase and vice versa. If that were the case in just a coule of instances I'd agree that NZ's driving standards might be a factor, but the data's not just from supposedly highly skilled countries.
The data in question is from NT. Have you driven much in Aussie? their driving is on par with NZ, at best. In WA and NT it's worse. Their vehicle fleet is similar to ours, culture is similar, in short there's no aberant variable that might explain why higher limits are less dangerous for them but would be more so for us.
I know it's not intuitively obvious, and officialdom of all sorts are certainly not tripping over each other in shaping transport policy accordingly, but it's true nonetheless.
The NZ drivers are crap thing... is it fact or fiction, do you think? If true what causes it?
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Do you really want to open that can of worms? Too late you asked the question and I'l stir the pot. NZ drivers are not crap. They are no worse than any other countries drivers and sadly no better. We have different cultural drivers to the likes of the Germans and Scandinavians etc which makes the driving different. I have seen video of a german pedestrian in the middle of the night with no traffic around waiting on the crossing light to change, this isn't due to their road sense or any such crap but more their culture of obeying TPTB, too many Irish, Scots and maori descendents in NZ for that to ever work here. We don't have the traffic volumes to keep us in line, we can see that gap ahead and know there is a slow ignorant prick holding us up, we know if we can just get past them we will have a smooth trip to the next latte.
As to the much spoken of driver training in Germany, it works because they obey, in NZ, as at present, we would pay lip service until we past and then go back to changeling the rule of authority and being just as annoyed by the prick that speeds up in the passing land and slows down after, whereas again the Germans clear the way for faster traffic.
Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. --- Unknown sage
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks