I should like to purchase a Yamaha Bolt.
http://www.starmotorcycles.com/star/...82/0/home.aspx
You need to sell it at aruond the $15k mark for it to be competitive, and it needs to have some accessories available.
In matt black I think.
I should like to purchase a Yamaha Bolt.
http://www.starmotorcycles.com/star/...82/0/home.aspx
You need to sell it at aruond the $15k mark for it to be competitive, and it needs to have some accessories available.
In matt black I think.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Butt (pun intended) it looks super Ghey.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Dear Yamaha NZ. As above conditions but with a modern version of this:
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
I already own the spiritual successor to the RZ350: Triumph Street Triple R. source: I rode an RZ350 in the 80's, and the ST-R is very similar but better in every respect except for the smell.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
That one does, sure: but look what can be done:
http://www.bikeexif.com/yamaha-bolt
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Dude, don't get me wrong: I loved that RZ, but the ST-R is a functionally better motorcycle in EVERY respect:
RZ350 weight claimed with full fuel tank and oil tank 168 kg.
ST-R: say 182. Win to the RZ
Sound: RZ has the two stroke scream
ST-R has an arrows 3 into 1 on it and it sounds bad-ass : its different: both are good. equal
power delivery: the RZ has YPVS so does not have the massive hit and 3000 rpm wide powerband of earlier 2T's but the ST-R has a step in the power (or at least the noise - I havent had mine on a dyno) which is sort of similar, but it has way more low and midrange grunt.
Here is the kicker: Power: and power to weight: Power for the RZ is stock around 60 (yes really) a handgrenade motor might get you 80. say it was 70: that is every kg has .41 hp pushing it along. The ST-R has .57 hp pushing every kg along.
The ST-R has modern brakes, bigger forks, and better tyres which have bigger contact patches.
Its a little taller but the bar/seat/peg relationship is similar (I would say the ST-R is a bit better for me but YMMV).
The ST-R is a better bike.
I would still like an RZ again though.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Funny how things change. In March you said "Meh" to the Bolt... http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...ht=yamaha+bolt
Remember the bit I said about about modern version?
30 years development should quite nicely address most of those issues. The RZ was quite heavy compared to say the TZR, itself 25yrs old.
A ride on or behind (on my Triumph Triple, ok not like an STR) my mates VJ23 RGV (17 yrs old) & like, No foul-stroke sounds anything as good. It is sex.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
SR500.....mmm loved them as a kid!
Yamaha in NZ are fucked.
I've had a few,great bikes but dieing here for some reason.
Buy a Triumph![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks