
Originally Posted by
wkid_one
I have always said the bike mags have it wrong. They hire ex-racers/aspiring racers/or just plain racers to test bikes that the jo-average plublic ride. They then fang a bike around roads and tracks at 11/10th's and then complain that this bike pushes a bit in the front, and that bike trams a little in the corner. However - what they don't say is that they were pulling 100mph around a corner - scraping the leading edge of the pipe and the pegs - a corner which no one but a racer could ever carry that speed.
I think more people would actually listen to, and respect the reviews if bike mags hired NORMAL riders. Ie: those that actually buy and ride the bike from a retail store......
I am all for 'rider reviews'...........hell, if I listened to everyone I would have never had bought the R1 (twitchy, flighty, wheel happy, too aggressive) - however it was simply a dream to ride. Nice rider position, wicked fuel injection mapping, flickable etc etc.
I rode nearly ALL the large bore bikes before I bought it - and too be honest - there is next to no difference between them in my opinion - the 954, R1, GSXR, Mille, 999, MV, SP2, SV1K, etc etc - it just comes down to personal preference (looks, experience, brand preference). The fact is - I could never ride the bikes to the point at which their failings become evident (or an issue), so to me, they are all great bikes. I bought the R1 because it was the sexiest looking bike (IMHO) and the right price. As for the SV1K - well - if I was going to stay twin - that was the one.....
It is a shit load of bike for the price.......in fact - I think it is the best 'bang for your buck' if you are buying new hands down.
Bookmarks