Well, you could be the only Busa rider in the country with a Kermit green Busa......... Have a calculate of the value of the service, then subtract that number from the asking price, then compare the remainder value against others on offer.........
Then add in a flight south on the big orange budgey, track time to understand the bike on the best track in NZ, and a road trip home, wins all around, I can tell you are on a roll right now............
Speed kills-just ask the rabbit......
I tend to buy new bike every year or two. I don't even know how long ago I had a bike with over 30k on it.
Its hard at 60k as if looked after by previous owners may do another 100k but if not looked after may not.
Any bike carries the same risk.
Idd get it checked and ask for service receipts.
Its a cracker price and a lot of bike for that money.
Not long ago I spotted a 2005 with 28k in silver for 7.5grand
Im not sure a busa would out handle a 12 in corners. Idd say the 12 would out handle my 14r by a long shot and reviews seems to rate the 14r handling above the generation 2 busa.
Busa would have a mid range pull advantage and higher top speed.
The reason busas held the top spot for so long is the range of accessories due to the length of unchanged production time.
I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.
Neither is supposed to be ridden around town...
Keep the Hornet, it's plenty good at that. You also want a more relaxed riding position. Again, the Hornet is the most relaxed...
Mileage? 60k is nothing on a Hornet.
edit: Servicing on the Hornet is a whole lot cheaper and simpler too...
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
Well ive lifted the pegs on the Hornet 30mm up and back over stock. And am looking at lower bars. After riding the Hyobag for the first time in a year I have found that a sports position may be able to work for me, its got flat bars on it now and rearsets set full back. Changing the pegs on the Hornet has helped me get to grips with its handling a lot. As for size my old Bandit was about the same as the Blackbird/Busa so that doesn't bother me.
As Im the only person that works on my bikes, servicing is a non-issue. Only place they will go to is Drury tyres for new rubbers from time to time.
Can't go wrong with a busa, def aint the best bike for lane splliting due to the width but everything which has been said previously has been true. Your spolit for choice with the after market, there are custom parts for everything to suit everyones style.
Most modified street bike in the world.
Someone explain the logic of buying a 300kph bike for 100kph speed limited roads?
I had a Blackbird for 8 years and absolutely loved it. Mossy's comments about catching the fairing is spot on but that's fixed by raising the rear ride height. Ignoring the emotional appeal of owning either bike, be ready for high "consumable" costs like rear tyres! Both bikes have bullet-proof motors with good routine maintenance. Lots of the UK Blackbird owners have done over a quarter of a million miles with nothing more than a cam chain tensioner change. Owning a 'bird or a 'busa is a great experience (notwithstanding Big Dave's valid comment ), particularly if you're on the open road a lot but they're naturally a bit more cumbersome in town than a lighter bike.
I've owned a Street Triple for 4 years since selling the 'bird. Interestingly, the difference in power to weight ratio between the Triple and 'bird is a lot less than you'd expect and it only becomes really apparent at open highway speeds. Pillion carrying isn't an issue for me. I miss the top end rush of the 'bird but overall, prefer the Triple for the type of riding I do these days. Horses for courses an' all that!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks