"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Thing is, driving is habitual. If we let people cut the open corners enough times, what they learn subconsciously is that it's okay to cut corners. Until one day they make a human error, and cut a corner when it's not a good idea.
Anyone who stays on the correct side of the road is at less risk of a head on than someone who strays from habit.
Please don't think that everyone who uses the roads make well evaluated, well informed decisions every time they do something.
Aye. People habitually take the path of least danger. They do, have a wee google.
And they continue to transgress over the white line rather than navigate that green slime under the bank, there no matter what the local "reality" is.
Have the local defenders of real estate discovered what level of corporate safety we're happy to call a target yet?
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
I see what you're saying. However, if you see someone cutting a corner correctly (in a safety sense) this is no indicator as to whether or not they are lilkely to fall in to this subconscious trap.
Does this mean we should never drive at 100kph because this will mean we're subconsciously conditioned to do so when it's not a good idea?
And if they stay at home they're at less risk of an accident full stop. This is a case of a perfectly safe maneauvre being used as evidence of a bad driver jsut because it's seen as unnecessary. Riding a motorcycle is unnecessary also.
I don't. That's why I'm still alive.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Despite all the grumbling on here, I was on the motorway in the old cage and there were cops everywhere. Just the presence seemed to be having an effect. Doesn't stop idiots being idiots, cutting others off, not using indicators, talking on mobile while in charge of a 10 tonner with a laden trailer, etc.
fuck, i got so high yesterday that driving at the speed limit was actually scary...
Just viewed the new tv ad promoting the message to slow down.
It's being released 5 Jan.
It'll be interesting to see the results. Oddly, it's along the lines of what I've been banging on about for the last few years.
Thought provoking. Akzle, you'll need to stay off the dak a few days or the point will fade into your haze.
i think the solution is clear. If you want to slow people down on the roads, get them really, really stoned....
So what your really saying is,
The guy got a ticket for not paying enough attention to his speedo but was watching the road and traffic around him staying with the flow but leaving a 3 second gap and just happened to sneak up from the 103 kms every one else was traveling at to 105 briefly?.![]()
winding up stucky since ages ago
Wow, everyone's an expert on what actually happened. Even when they weren't there. Still, this is KB.
What actually happened was the Police reduced the tolerance to 4 km/h for all of December and January. They then spent a gazillion dollars advertising the fact in the media, TV, papers, magazines, Facebook, Twitter, pretty much anywhere they could.
Then someone got caught in excess of the tolerance.
Is it really a surprise it happened?
For the record, when we do speed checks we find that most folk are actually travelling between 90 and 95, not the 103 you quote. Anyone doing over the well publicized tolerance is actually doing about 10 above what most others are.
Still, never let the facts stand in the way of a good post.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks