Nice video Buggs.
Ah the Tukino track. . .
Takes me back a few years when a mate, my son and l rode up to the snowline, in mid summer!
Nice video Buggs.
Ah the Tukino track. . .
Takes me back a few years when a mate, my son and l rode up to the snowline, in mid summer!
There are two kinds of adventurers: those who go truly hoping to find adventure and those who go secretly hoping they won't. We should come home from our adventures having faced their perils and uncertainties, endured their discomfort and beaten the odds, with a sly acknowledgment and revitalised solidarity of character.
That was cool, been eyeing that on the map for awhile, will have to get up there on the DR.
(Brutally), if you as you say find it ''a bit bumper on the road'' then these devices have singularly failed to improve abrupt bump compliance ( known as high speed compression damping, suspension shaft velocity, not bike velocity ) The video above gives some indication of that
A well designed device will not only deliver a sizable improvement in chassis pitch control and dynamic ride height control, it should also deliver a sizable improvement in abrupt bump compliance. That the Intiminators fall well short of what is possible is undeniable . That they fall well short of what is acceptable is also undeniable.
There are two kinds of adventurers: those who go truly hoping to find adventure and those who go secretly hoping they won't. We should come home from our adventures having faced their perils and uncertainties, endured their discomfort and beaten the odds, with a sly acknowledgment and revitalised solidarity of character.
Yes, if the fork oil viscosity is slightly too high ( which it was for such forks ) it means that rebound action is lazy which it clearly was at especially the top of the stroke ( topping out area ) If recovery is not fast enough that then means that the forks are not back at ride height before the next obstacle. That creates harshness not too dissmiliar to having too much high speed compression. I will at least give Ricor some credit that they recognise the need for a more responsive oil, but in part its also because their device creates some rebound damping and is very restrictive on compression at especially higher velocities
My salient points about the limitations and the infuriating American hype that accompanies them rigidly remain. Smoke and mirrors, and I have no respect for such ''engineering'' Neither as it clearly can be understood does another company that makes a credible device that has a shim stack.
Buggs
I think you had the music up too loud and lost concentration!
Hey Buggs ~ haven't you been there before ...the WAR RIDE~~![]()
"Those who hammer there guns into plow shears will plow for those who do not" Thomas Jefferson
Just back from thoroughly testing these things and now for an inexpert opinion.
As Buggs says they have a certain harshness to them, or to put it in more nautical terms they're a bit 'jobbley'
The front wheel doesnt seem to quite make it back to the ground quick enough on the little sharp bumps but it doesnt break loose when hard braking over corrugations.
I wouldnt take them out because they solve the brake dive issue the Africa Twin has and as I ride a lot of tight twisties brake dive is something I can live without.
The question now RT is, What if I take one out? I think there is a model of BMW which has comp in one leg and rebound in the other so I dont think it will cause any silly buisiness (correct me if I'm wrong)
I'm thinking I will get the best of both worlds, acceptable brake dive and less harshness (jobble) with quicker rebound??
I almost forgot about that one Clint! Yeah that took a while to rebuild the plastics! THen there was the one when I went through the windscreen up under the mountain... that was the rear shock. And then this one Mark - this was at new years this year. F*ck I'm a slow learner!
As for another WAR ride. Yep it's on the list, hopefully this year, and will probably be a winter ride (read: snow!). Maybe I'll do one in spring too. Wanna do something a little different up there though. I don't really want to start a thread on it as it will be a closed-ish group with a trusted few.
There are two kinds of adventurers: those who go truly hoping to find adventure and those who go secretly hoping they won't. We should come home from our adventures having faced their perils and uncertainties, endured their discomfort and beaten the odds, with a sly acknowledgment and revitalised solidarity of character.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks