Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 214

Thread: Speeding facts vs fiction

  1. #1
    Join Date
    13th September 2012 - 20:50
    Bike
    2014 BMW G650GS
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    179

  2. #2
    Join Date
    20th January 2008 - 17:29
    Bike
    1972 Norton Commando
    Location
    Auckland NZ's Epicentre
    Posts
    3,554
    Its a bit like standing up in the Pub and announcing that Alcohol being bad for you is a myth
    DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    That is a good light hearted description of the truth about speed vs accidents. Although it is UK based it reference information from USA and Canada, and emphisises the important part "When speed limits are increased, the accident rate drops".
    Time to ride

  4. #4
    Join Date
    6th May 2012 - 10:41
    Bike
    invisibike
    Location
    pulling a sick mono
    Posts
    6,054
    Blog Entries
    4
    i like speeding

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th March 2006 - 10:29
    Bike
    KTM 1190 Adv R and a bunch of dirties
    Location
    Burglary capital of Unzud
    Posts
    2,879
    That is based on interpreting the propoganda etc as that, speeding causes crashes. Which is true and this set of stats says it isn't a big number. I was surprised that booze didn't feature in the stats which is another catch cry.

    Listening more closely to the propoganda in the last few years I'm detecting a change of message from, speed causes crashes, to lower speed = lower carnage. Which is also true. The slower the crash the less the injury and death. This for me is also flawed and is a better ambulance at the bottom of the cliff approach. Please can we have more fences at the top.

    I'm not seeing a lot of propaganda on the cause of crashes other than, booze, driving age and cell phones.

    Every day of my daily dorkland commute, I see several instances of dangerous tail gating, lane changes, red light runners, incompetent driving, brain dead driving, etc. The PTB need to suck it up and add more tricks to the pony on the causes.

    Crashes (I refuse to call them accidents) will always happen when there are humans in control, question is how do we minimise that without taking away my freedoms?
    Quote Originally Posted by Albert
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe

  6. #6
    Join Date
    13th November 2011 - 15:32
    Bike
    '09 Bandit 1250s
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    2,135
    Quote Originally Posted by paturoa View Post
    Every day of my daily dorkland
    Crashes (I refuse to call them accidents) will always happen when there are humans in control, question is how do we minimise that without taking away my freedoms?

    Police could actually ticket bad/dangerous driving (a friend on fb was showing her 2 tickets, one for no seatbelt and one for speeding, the cop said to her "I saw you had no seatbelt, so I looked at my radar, I saw you were speeding so pulled you over" basically, cop would have ignored seatbelt if she wasn't speeding).

    Or if you cause one crash, 40 hours community service, start from L plates again for all licenses.

    If you cause a second accident 100 hours community service and stand down of 6 months before you can apply for your learners again.

    If you are the cause of another accident, your insurance should charge you for all damages caused by your actions, 200 hours community service and a year before you can resit your learners.

    If you cause any more accidents in your life, you obviously are a slow learner, lifetime ban of operating any vehicle and jail time.

    Peoples lives are dependant on drivers ability. Why is a vehicle allowed to cause more damage than a gun, yet any damage caused by a vehicle is punished less than any damage by a gun?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    6th May 2012 - 10:41
    Bike
    invisibike
    Location
    pulling a sick mono
    Posts
    6,054
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by haydes55 View Post
    Peoples lives are dependant on drivers ability. Why is a vehicle allowed to cause more damage than a gun, yet any damage caused by a vehicle is punished less than any damage by a gun?
    because guns are scary and dangerous.
    just like cars are safe and sppeding is dangerous.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    8th January 2013 - 20:18
    Bike
    2006 Suzuki Hayabusa
    Location
    North Shore, Auckland
    Posts
    859
    Fact: If you speed you will get to your destination faster

  9. #9
    Join Date
    20th January 2008 - 17:29
    Bike
    1972 Norton Commando
    Location
    Auckland NZ's Epicentre
    Posts
    3,554
    Quote Originally Posted by The Reibz View Post
    Fact: If you speed you will get to your destination faster
    If you leave earlier you there on time too
    DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    2nd December 2009 - 13:51
    Bike
    A brmm, brmm one
    Location
    Upper-Upper Hutt
    Posts
    2,153
    Quote Originally Posted by Voltaire View Post
    If you leave earlier you there on time too
    if you leave early & "speed" you'll get there earlier & have more time to relax/play
    Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance
    "Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk

  11. #11
    Join Date
    8th January 2013 - 20:18
    Bike
    2006 Suzuki Hayabusa
    Location
    North Shore, Auckland
    Posts
    859
    Both Valid points.

    The more you speed the less time you spend on the road.
    The less time you spend on the road, the less likely you are to have a accident?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    17th July 2003 - 23:37
    Bike
    CB1300
    Location
    Tuakau
    Posts
    4,796
    Quote Originally Posted by haydes55 View Post
    Police could actually ticket bad/dangerous driving (a friend on fb was showing her 2 tickets, one for no seatbelt and one for speeding, the cop said to her "I saw you had no seatbelt, so I looked at my radar, I saw you were speeding so pulled you over" basically, cop would have ignored seatbelt if she wasn't speeding).

    Or if you cause one crash, 40 hours community service, start from L plates again for all licenses.

    If you cause a second accident 100 hours community service and stand down of 6 months before you can apply for your learners again.

    If you are the cause of another accident, your insurance should charge you for all damages caused by your actions, 200 hours community service and a year before you can resit your learners.

    If you cause any more accidents in your life, you obviously are a slow learner, lifetime ban of operating any vehicle and jail time.

    Peoples lives are dependant on drivers ability. Why is a vehicle allowed to cause more damage than a gun, yet any damage caused by a vehicle is punished less than any damage by a gun?
    The flaw to this argument is the definition of fault. By your standard I would be banned for life and bankrupt. My first few accidents I was deemed to be at fault, not for my actions, because I was on a learner or restricted license.

    Each time I was told if I had had a full license I would not have had any blame.


    Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,493
    I have always known speed doesn't kill.



    However rapid deceleration spread over a very short time frame is very bad for your health
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  14. #14
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 15:33
    Bike
    77' CB750 Cafe Racer, 2009 Z750
    Location
    Majorka'
    Posts
    1,395
    In 50 years time when we are deemed too reckless/feckless to control a vehicle ourselves I wonder if people will look back and wonder how we we ever accepted 1.2 million people a year dying from car accidents? And some people get nervous about flying!

    Why is there no motorway/skid pan training as part of the driving test?

    Why are we not tested every 5 years?
    I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..

  15. #15
    Join Date
    14th June 2011 - 01:46
    Bike
    Between bikes
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    1,013
    Quote Originally Posted by jonbuoy View Post
    Why are we not tested every 5 years?
    Because half the cunts on the road that got their licence in a weet-bix packet 25 years ago will lose it.

    Licence testing ain't great, but some drivers are fuckin atrocious.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •