Past my restricted

**Murray** · 29th October 2014, 14:24

Originally Posted by James Deuce

No it isn't. Plural is "Culs-de-sac". Singular is "Cul-de-sac".

Yes it is. There are two options, either can be used. I don't live life safe I'm a motorcyclist.

Some dictionaries list both "culs-de-sac" and "cul-de-sacs" as acceptable plurals, but when a dictionary lists only one, it is "culs-de-sac"—making "culs-de-sac" the safer choice.

**Tazz** · 29th October 2014, 14:26

Profoundly perturbed that none of these preposterous persons have propagated in passing your particular past title peculiarity that positively purloined passed your peepers at the point of your posting...

(just wanted to join the echo in the room).

**Murray** · 29th October 2014, 14:27

Originally Posted by sidecar bob

Its "would have" not "would of", which is pesant speak for would've.

What is a pesant?

**Gremlin** · 29th October 2014, 14:27

Originally Posted by sidecar bob

...which is pesant speak ...

**Murray** · 29th October 2014, 14:27

Originally Posted by Tazz

Profoundly perturbed that none of these preposterous persons have propagated in passing this particular past title peculiarity that positively purloined passed your peepers at the point of your posting...

(just wanted to join the echo in the room).

Why don't you just P off!!!!

**Tazz** · 29th October 2014, 14:35

Originally Posted by Murray

Why don't you just P off!!!!

Please pause from getting your panties in a predicament, pissflaps.

**James Deuce** · 29th October 2014, 14:36

Originally Posted by Murray

Yes it is. There are two options, either can be used. I don't live life safe I'm a motorcyclist.

Some dictionaries list both "culs-de-sac" and "cul-de-sacs" as acceptable plurals, but when a dictionary lists only one, it is "culs-de-sac"—making "culs-de-sac" the safer choice.

The ones listing both need to be hung up by their cul-de-sacs.

This would explain why it is acceptable to use "Statement of Works" in a commercial document instead of "Statements of Work" when discussing multiple pieces of work under a single framework then? Because from my perspective it isn't. It significantly changes the meaning from that intended.

**awa355** · 29th October 2014, 14:37

Originally Posted by Ifsn8u

Past my restricted this morning in aucklands rainy spring weather.

Sow ya goch ya lycince ah??? Gud onya

**awa355** · 29th October 2014, 14:43

Originally Posted by Murray

Yes it is. There are two options, either can be used. I don't live life safe I'm a motorcyclist.

Some dictionaries list both "culs-de-sac" and "cul-de-sacs" as acceptable plurals, but when a dictionary lists only one, it is "culs-de-sac"—making "culs-de-sac" the safer choice.

What ever happened to 'Dead end street'???