
Originally Posted by
MrKiwi
Except, as it has been for several years, it is a no fault system within risk groups. Motorcycles are a risk grouping, just as forestry workers are in the employers bit of ACC. As such it is a no fault scheme within risk groups.
And therein lies the problem.
Why these risk groups? Why not group on race? See what reaction that gets from the public.

Originally Posted by
MrKiwi
I don't like this interpretation of the ACC legislation but it is in it, and Parliament specifically amended the legislation to provide for this feature in the Act.
That's what happens when we get shit-heads in parliament that don't care one iota about anything beyond political mileage. It doesn't change the fact that the only fair implementation of ACC is to have no risk groups at all.
What we need is a system of legally binding referenda. And to have EVERY change to legislation to have to go through one.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks