Querying a speed ticket - should I expect to receive proof of the radar reading?

[bogan]

Nevermind deleted comment

Or was it...

Your a real debbie downer piss off and have a tanty in some other thread

[old rig]

Are we up to the bit in the thread where the Lesbians turn up yet?

Fuckin hope so i can't go on much longer

Sent from my XT535 using Tapatalk 2

[Katman]

Are we up to the bit in the thread where the Lesbians turn up yet?

Fuckin hope so i can't go on much longer

You're welcome.

[rastuscat]

It seems everyones home from work and has the interweb lit up

[Akzle]

the risk of losing your career by making stuff up?

...

like that's happened. ever.

cops lie, plant evidence, and still get a fucken state funeral and called "men beyond reproach" (by other cops in the old white boys' circle jerk(ing young white boys) club)

About risking careers, 64 cops were charged with offences in the years 2009-2011.

and how many of those 64 are STILL gainfully employed as policy enforcement officers? (most, eh?)

Ps, unless you are a benificiary it will cost you more in lost earnings to defend anything less than 40 over. 20 over of you are on minimum wage.

thats where you seek tort damages awarded against the vexatious litigant!

Problem with writing a letter is that you are basically admitting guilt and asking to be let off. Doubt that would work and then that would be the evidence if i did decide to challenge.

then you're writing the wrong kind of letter. google this shit homie. like "how to get off a speeding ticket"

Do you propose that a cop must also pull over another motorist and ask them to sign a statement that yes, indeed, the radar does say 102 and yes, indeed, this is a 90 zone?

it's what they do in yankland...

[Akzle]

and it is policy for the offending motorist to be invited to View the locked readout speed on the radar unit.

Were you invited to view it ... ???? ... and DID you view it .. ?????

that's why you demand, roadside, that the radar be sealed as evidence.

[Akzle]

It seems everyones home from work and has the interweb lit up

fucken lit something up, but it doesn't taste like interweb.

[gonzo_akl]

I think your science is wrong. The radar works by measuring the time it takes for the laser pulse to be reflected back off it's target ... and we are talking nanoseconds. So really simplified ... it fires a pulse which bounces back and you can tell how far away the target is from the time it takes to get the reflection. It then fires another (now milliseconds later) and again can tell how far away the target is now. Simple maths then to work out how far the target has travelled between the two readings and in what time to work out the speed. Wouldn't make a difference if the wheel is spinning backwards or forwards. Pretty sure they'd be firing their beam at the headlight as it has a nice reflector on the back, just right for reflecting laser pulses.

Pretty sure that most police radars work by measuring the Doppler effect and not by measuring the change in distance between pulses. But it has been 20+ years since I've had anything first hand to do with them. Other radar system do indeed work as you discribed

[rastuscat]

Pretty sure that most police radars work by measuring the Doppler effect and not by measuring the change in distance between pulses. But it has been 20+ years since I've had anything first hand to do with them. Other radar system do indeed work as you discribed

It's doppler effect for Police radars.

Or Donut effect. I forget the details.

[Big Dog]

...

like that's happened. ever.

cops lie, plant evidence, and still get a fucken state funeral and called "men beyond reproach" (by other cops in the old white boys' circle jerk(ing young white boys) club)


and how many of those 64 are STILL gainfully employed as policy enforcement officers? (most, eh?)

thats where you seek tort damages awarded against the vexatious litigant!

then you're writing the wrong kind of letter. google this shit homie. like "how to get off a speeding ticket"

it's what they do in yankland...

In order:
They may be cops but they are also human. That weakness is also the strength, let us never surrender the humanity for absolute correctness.

Lets see some actual numbers and cases before we get too carried away, but even then 64 "out of how many again?" is hardly even a statistical variation. Compared to the rates of crime in other professions I'll take my chances and if I feel wronged after taking a proper look at the situation I will gather the evidence and do the needful. Until then... HTFU pills and pay the fine.

Pretty sure you can't seek tort damages for lost income on defending a driving charge without also showing that any wrong on the part of the police was intentional... a much steeper hill to mow than getting off the ticket.


Pretty much.


Dear god no! It is bad enough working in Auckland. Don't even suggest we morph into the states!

PS, can't be fucked doing the fancy formatting you do to put in the multiquotes from the same post shit. I cost to much an hour for that.

[Big Dog]

It's doppler effect for Police radars.

Or Donut effect. I forget the details.

Of there is the simple effect called physics... by virtue of its contact with the road and the bike the tyres rotational speed is identical to the land speed (unless the ticket is for sustained loss of traction and you have a front wheel drive bike).

[Scuba_Steve]

Or Donut effect. I forget the details.

mmm donut effect

[scumdog]

...

like that's happened. ever.

cops lie, plant evidence, and still get a fucken state funeral and called "men beyond reproach" (by other cops in the old white boys' circle jerk(ing young white boys) club)


and how many of those 64 are STILL gainfully employed as policy enforcement officers? (most, eh?)

thats where you seek tort damages awarded against the vexatious litigant!

then you're writing the wrong kind of letter. google this shit homie. like "how to get off a speeding ticket"

it's what they do in yankland...

Ah, predictable clap-trap...I love it!

[scumdog]

& proof of the existence of lizard men is on teh interwebs, as someone recorded it there, manually

Fooo, good england bro!

[scumdog]

But I'm more interested in why cameras shouldn't be expected so am hoping you will shed some light on that

Mainly because you tight-arses aren't speeding enough hence there's not enough money available to buy all the cops a camera - and have the suitable soft-ware to support the scheme.

Not too hard to figure it out