Video evidence - Pros and cons

[Scuba_Steve]

Do you have the bends?

The law states that an officers sworn testimony is legally admissible as evidence. So if an officer says you are guilty, and you cannot provide better evidence stating otherwise, according to the law you are guilty.

its the way it is.

#Retards

officers sworn testimony... like the one presented in a court of law, that sort of sworn testimony which a civilian can also give as noted by RC a bit back
And what piece of legislation would this be found in, I'll go find it myself

[Big Dog]

So to do nothing is to be presumed innocent... yet they'll steal your money anyways meaning in reality you were presumed guilty, the fact the accused has the onus of proving their innocence & that they have to arrange for the chance to do this confirms they are presumed guilty until proven innocence in reality

It's the system, but not the law

The spiel on the back of the ticket says something along the lines of failing to object within a suitable time frame is considered an admission, failure to pay during the same ( or confess) timeframe may lead to additional costs.


Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

[Gadget1]

Do you have the bends?

The law states that an officers sworn testimony is legally admissible as evidence. So if an officer says you are guilty, and you cannot provide better evidence stating otherwise, according to the law you are guilty.

its the way it is.

#Retards

Yes it is admissible as evidence, just as the accused provides evidence (Scuba Steve is correct). However, the Judge or JP decides if the accused is guilty not the police.

[nodrog:Me]

Yes it is admissible as evidence, just as the accused provides evidence (Scuba Steve is correct). However, the Judge or JP decides if the accused is guilty not the police.

No shit.

but how do you think that conversation is going to go?

Officer "I saw the offender breaking the law"

Dumbass "I don't think thats very fair"

Judge "FFS, Roffle cakes"

[Gadget1]

No shit.

but how do you think that conversation is going to go?

Officer "I saw the offender breaking the law"

Dumbass "I don't think thats very fair"

Judge "FFS, Roffle cakes"

No, here's an example of how the process works, unlike in your motarded world:https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/site...-red-light.pdf

Notice how certain words are used, like "This means the police think that you..." etc.

[nodrog:Me]

No, here's an example of how the process works, unlike in your motarded world:https://www.legalaid.vic.gov.au/site...-red-light.pdf

Notice how certain words are used, like "This means the police think that you..." etc.

You fucken spastic, I'm referring to the tards that think their word against a sworn officers is somehow defence evidence.

comprehension isn't just a screw on the bottom of your fork leg.

[Gadget1]

You fucken spastic, I'm referring to the tards that think their word against a sworn officers is somehow defence evidence.

comprehension isn't just a screw on the bottom of your fork leg.

Given you haven't shown any previous willingness to learn about the way things really go, very basic step by step info was needed.

[swarfie]

You fucken spastic, I'm referring to the tards that think their word against a sworn officers is somehow defence evidence.

comprehension isn't just a screw on the bottom of your fork leg.

FFS Gordy just let the wanker go off to court and pay the fine AND the court costs
Some people just cannot be helped

[Akzle]

Youtube has this 'camera shake fix' thing you can tick when you upload a video. It basically does some post-processing to try and make people sensitive to motion sickness hurl as quickly as possible. Whomever decided it was a good idea can eat a buffet of dicks.

its the fisheye bullshit that gets me. Who wants a fuken video of ANYTHING where the horizon is fuken curvy?

[pete376403]

*buzzer* wrong. You are not 'guilty until proven innocent', you are 'charged with an alleged offence until proven innocent'. Just like any. other. offence. The only difference is, you don't have to go to court to plead guilty and be sentenced, you can just pay the fixed fine and move along. Or you can deny the offence and have your day in court just like anything else.

Yes well in most cases (not traffic) you are"charged with an alleged offence until proven GUILTY". I think the only time you're expected to prove innocence is when you're after compensation after being locked up for something a later court decides you may not have done after all, but the justice minister doesn't want to pay out. (eg David Bain)

[nodrog:Me]

Given you haven't shown any previous willingness to learn about the way things really go, very basic step by step info was needed.

Rofflecopter, I'm all about learning stuffs from internet forums.

what teaching diploma have you downloaded?

[Gadget1]

Rofflecopter, I'm all about learning stuffs from internet forums.

what teaching diploma have you downloaded?

Seeing how the info I posted was from the Victoria Legal Aid site, it isn't a forum.

If I was to look at some form of teaching, in your case it would be at the Early Childhood Education level.

[rastuscat]

officers sworn testimony... like the one presented in a court of law, that sort of sworn testimony which a civilian can also give as noted by RC a bit back
And what piece of legislation would this be found in, I'll go find it myself

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/p...DLM393463.html

[Scuba_Steve]

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/p...DLM393463.html

Cheers Mr R.Cat

[rastuscat]

Cheers Mr R.Cat

I would have found the section, but it looks as boring as bat shit.