ACC proposals on motorcycle levies

[Digitdion]

My bikes got ABS , traction control etc etc.
Abit simplistic but, if you go by what they are doing with cars why am I not getting an ACC discount because of these safety devices on my bike?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Swoop]

You are correct if few want to debate or agree with my view it must mean the majority are happy...

No. Most people here know that you are a retarded cocksucker and choose not to waste their time debating with the mentally insane.

I tried to debate earlier in this thread - but it went even to a greater depth of nowhere than previously I thought possible.

Wise move.

I hope it wasn't the same dog you hit 2 times ... ... that would be retarded (and unlucky for the poor dog) ..

I was wondering that when she first posted it. I wouldn't eliminate the fact that it was the same dog. Probably her own and it was attempting to commit suicide to get away from her.

[Berries]

There is a saying that there are those who have stacked and those who are yet to stack.

A saying that would only come from two groups of people, non riders who don't have a clue and riders who have crashed but believe that it was inevitable and there was nothing they could have done about it. A nice little get out clause that one to save people looking in a mirror too closely.

On icy and wet roads and hit a dog 2 times if you really want to know plus was hit by a car doing a u turn.

You go on about how most motorbike crashes are the fault of a car driver yet I look at these five and only see one that involved another vehicle. And you didn't hit them, oh no, you were hit by them.

It would appear that you are the reason we have to pay so much to ACC.

[Berries]

There you go with the inevitability again. There is nothing heroic about trying not to crash.


You should try it sometime.

[TheDemonLord]

There you go with the inevitability again. There is nothing heroic about trying not to crash.


You should try it sometime.

Unless you are trying not to crash while fighting the Evil dragon, from the north lands who is soul bound to the Ancient Dark lord who lurks in the desecrated plains where none return from.


Then it's pretty heroic.

[PSYCHO]

better stock up on some lube because we're gonna get shafted, and deep, balls deep.

[PrincessBandit]

So now, I am just sitting here wanking.

It was difficult to do in this thread, but I managed.

At least you should be deriving some pleasure then? I'd would be a bit worried if flogging the log to cassina's posts was a turn on for you though.

[TheDemonLord]

I'd would be a bit worried if flogging the log to cassina's posts was a turn on for you though.

I dunno - glaring logical fallacies have been known to be highly erotic.

[PrincessBandit]

I dunno - glaring phalluses have been known to be highly erotic.

Hmmmm, mebbeh

[bogan]

I wonder how many of you would still happy for those at fault to not have to pay more, if ACC for over 600cc went to over $2000 which is what they believe is the true cost. I have just read comments on the ACC site and there is no to very little thinking the way you lot think with a few coments from people like me who think those that cause accidents are the ones who should be paying a higher premium.

Feel free to migrate there to be with your own kind then.

[Matt Bleck]

I wonder how many of you would still happy for those at fault to not have to pay more, if ACC for over 600cc went to over $2000 which is what they believe is the true cost. I have just read comments on the ACC site and there is no to very little thinking the way you lot think with a few coments from people like me who think those that cause accidents are the ones who should be paying a higher premium.

Ahhhh, you do realize that ACC is a no fault system aye?

The reason your rego is high is because you choose to ride a vehicle that offers no protection in a accident therefore costing ACC more to fix/rehabilitate you regardless of who's fault it was.

[TheDemonLord]

Hmmmm, mebbeh

Always back to the Phalluses eh?

[bogan]

You are wrong thinking its a no fault system because if that was the case everyone would be paying the same premium would they not? Going by your logic trucks should be paying even less because they can crush a car in the same way a car can crush a bike. Also going by your logic diesel 4WDs must be as unsafe as motorcycles as they cost the same as a big bike to register too.

People like you who blame motorcyclists for being at fault by buying a bike are very much in the minority.

No, since fault is not the same as risk.

You are the one blaming the bikers, with your ideas that those who have crashes should pay more; since the govt has found bikers crash 17x more often.

[PrincessBandit]

Always back to the Phalluses eh?

Well, I thought it went quite well pronounced as "phallus-ies".

[bogan]

You need to read my previous posts again. I have said those that "ARE AT FAULT" in crashes should be paying more. It is that simple.

So you do want us to be paying 2k regos then? Or are you saying specifically the specific person who falls off should pay for their own treatment? cos that isn't ACC at all, that isn't vehicle rego at all. That isn't any semblance of a good idea at all.

PS, I'm not reading that crap again, I'm allergic to stupidity and barely comprehensible grammar so feel free to go felate a dictionary...