Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Want GN250 or GN125

  1. #16
    Join Date
    12th November 2004 - 09:11
    Bike
    2008 Kettweisel Style.
    Location
    on my arse
    Posts
    3,623

    Arrow My speciality

    Quote Originally Posted by Dart
    inlinefour:

    Good links, but all of these bikes are very old, and chances that theyll broke soon are very high...
    Old bikes done up to great nick and sold at a profit. If you know how to maintian a bike and identify and fix problems, then its not a issue. Besides going to see the bike and having a good play can usually identify most issues with a bike. I disagree completely with the comment on them braking, have you seen the bikes and whats your knowledge on mechanics? Mine is not at the top of the scale but good enough to rebuild and restore old bikes. If your wanting new, and that does not allways mean hassle free, you could allways do what I'm doing and buy a new blade also. Although I wonder if your looking for lamb at mutton prices?
    Those who insist on perfect safety, don't have the balls to live in the real world.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by gamgee
    dart age doesn't matter to much either of these would be good (from that list)
    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Mo...n-35786413.htm
    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Mo...n-36026682.htm
    wouldn't touch the other two the k's are just to high, um would probably go with the srx, a bit more fun, but it's your money oh and the new gn250's aren't as good a quality as te old ones, if your hooked on a gn i'd get an old one, they don't break down and your going to be selling it in a few months when you want something quicker
    Don't often see another SRX. They have to be seriously one of the best bikes out for a learner. Dead easy to ride, forgiving, fast enough and good enough handling to not get bored , and enough power to cope easily with open road riding up to license losing speeds.And you don't have to rev the guts out of them. Comfortable (reasonably, anyway), and if you do drop it not much to get broken, and that cheap to fix. And they do 90 mpg so cheap as chips to run. And nice and simple if you do your own maintainence. Obviously, I'm biased. (Rattys coming up to 90000 km and all good , 4 stroke singles just go on and on)
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  3. #18
    Join Date
    26th September 2004 - 11:51
    Bike
    '90 GSXR250 in black
    Location
    Dunnas
    Posts
    1,646
    wtf??? 90mpg??? are you sure because that would have to be some sort of economy record, i used to get about 22-24km per litre on my scooter, i get 15km per litre on the vt250

  4. #19
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by gamgee
    wtf??? 90mpg??? are you sure because that would have to be some sort of economy record, i used to get about 22-24km per litre on my scooter, i get 15km per litre on the vt250
    Yeah, 80mpg if I cane it, 90 pootling . NB M p G . Not the funny metricfierical stuff. Nothing like a single for economy.Tis the revs that do it, in 50kph zones I don't go over 3000 rpm. I suspect you're never UNDER 3000 rpm.
    (just checked my last fill 81 mpg, mostly motorway work, motorway brings it down, especially with the wind we've been having lately. 29 and odd kilmoetres per litre thingy , I think, if you must use funny measures. )

    EDIT: I say it's the revs , cos on the occasions where I feel the need for a good old fashioned fang , which is keeping it between 7000 and the 11000 red line for a while , the petrol consumption goes wayyyyyyyyyyyy up.

    EDITY EDIT: FXR150's do over 100 mpg . Parsimonious little buggers
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  5. #20
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    Quote Originally Posted by gamgee
    wtf??? 90mpg??? are you sure because that would have to be some sort of economy record, i used to get about 22-24km per litre on my scooter, i get 15km per litre on the vt250
    Take your kms per litre & multiply by approx 4.5 to give you the MPG
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  6. #21
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by MSTRS
    Take your kms per litre & multiply by approx 4.5 to give you the MPG
    No, that'll give you km per gallon. You then need to multiply by 0.625 to turn that into imperial miles per good old fashioned reliable cast iron imperial gallon.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  7. #22
    Join Date
    26th September 2004 - 11:51
    Bike
    '90 GSXR250 in black
    Location
    Dunnas
    Posts
    1,646

    in this here country we use a proper measuring system, none of this 'half robin hoods bow draw length" and "2/3 a camels piss on a sunday" it's km per litre, but anyway my bike idles at 1500rpm, and sitting at about 50-60 in 6th i'm usually just under 5000rpm, i don't think it's possible to ride my bike under 3000rpm

  8. #23
    Join Date
    17th September 2005 - 12:55
    Bike
    BMW F650CS
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    195

    GN125

    Quote Originally Posted by MSTRS
    Take your kms per litre & multiply by approx 4.5 to give you the MPG
    Multiply km/ltr by 2.83 to convert to mpg

    Anyway back to the real deal.
    I've got a 2004 GN125 that's done 9500 km and really does 35-38 km/litre=100-108 mpg! Its been run in properly and serviced. Great, good handling little bike that's unbeatable in the urban environment. Will get to 100 km but happier at 85. I'm buying a bigger bike but would keep the GN125, if I could but the CEO says there's no room.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •