AMS Controller: Continental give me a good rate please through FL100?
Continental: Well sir, we are doing 2000 feet per minute.
AMS Controller: Could you make it 3000 feet per minute?
Continental : No sir.
AMS Controller: Oh, do you not have a speedbrake?
Continental: Yes sir, I do, but that is for MY mistakes, not for yours!
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
What connection is there between what I wrote about "making time for yourself" and, consequently, "space and room to maneuvre" and what you wrote about speed through corners? I'd suggest very little connection and if this was a fifth form essay I'd be handing it back with the instruction to "answer or comment upon the question". Reply to what is said and do not throw up red herrings.
This is what you do, even in heavy traffic flows:
If you are in bumper-to-bumper it does work. You move to the right of your lane to see beyond the vehicle in front while still maintaining your lane position - "owning your lane" - and if need be you drop back a wee bit to give yourself enough room to stop without having to nose dive your bike. If someone in the adjacent lane wants to change lanes, probably because they haven't checked properly - an altogether too common habit of NZ drivers, then you can either give them a wee "note on the horn" or just drop back and let them go in ahead. Then you re-position yourself for maximum view ahead.
Also, if you're in heavy traffic and the person following will likely overtake you and fill the gap then it sounds like you're on a two-lane road only and you're probably better off having them in front of you where you can keep an eye on them rather than behind you and tailgating you.
There are many on here who will agree with Honest Andy.
And before anyone else asks "Why are you replying?" - because if there is someone reading this who is new to biking and has never driven a car and so has no experience of driving on a road, as opposed to someone coming to a bike who already has experience driving, then this sort of irresponsible "dribble" needs to be rebutted. Even if we do feel we are hitting our heads against a brick wall...
Yes, "making time for yourself" could involve slowing down and consequently increasing your following distance. It might also involve you positioning yourself differently in your lane to give a better view ahead or even changing lanes on a multi-lane road. Which I do will depend upon any number of factors in play at that time and what I think will be the best solution at that time.
Very true, many crashes do occur at or below the speed limit - I think there's been some recent reports from the UK about crash causes. However if you have a crash at very low speed then questions should be asked about your preparedness for whatever could happen at that speed - were you really aware of what was going on round you? what had you done to improve your view ahead and behind of yourself? had you increased your following distance so as to avoid a sudden or emergency stop? had you made yourself visible to other road users?
[I would accept that if you are riding at very slow speed in heavy traffic and someone crosses the centre line and hits you then that could be called an accident and it could be argued that your only contributing factor to the accident was being on that particular section of road at that time. However, there are some, perhaps playing devil's advocate, who would counter argue that you should have been more observant of your surroundings and when you realised that a vehicle was about to cross the centre line you should have done whatever you could to get out of its way.]
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks