Page 12 of 17 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 243

Thread: Four dead and two hurt today

  1. #166
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,269
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jasonu View Post
    I'm surprised Pritch hasn't already done that.
    Nah. Trump's got enought to worry about just keeping track of his idiot kids.
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  2. #167
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    several
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    9,590
    haven't read any of the posts...

    While I was at a bikers funeral with a few others here... yes 4 others died, just like to add there was another the day before and the day after a guy I knew in Aussie...

    sort ya shit out people and pull ya heads in before they get taken off

    safe travels all...
    cheers DD
    (Definately Dodgy)



  3. #168
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    Why not ride wearing a pair of binoculars up to your eyes? You could just move them about like you suggest & would be the same effect.
    Never worked for me. But if it works for you ...
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  4. #169
    Join Date
    5th December 2009 - 12:32
    Bike
    Yes
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    3,284
    Quote Originally Posted by trustme View Post
    Hey Rastus , can you confirm that the highest motorcycle acc claimants are as follows

    1/ Sport bike riders
    2/ Scooters
    3/ Lams

    Cruisers ie Harleys etc are down the list
    Well, perhaps Rastus can confirm ACC claims, but figured I would jump in with some numbers as well. Seems like an annual thing.

    45 fatal crashes in 2017 involving motorbikes. Down from 55 the year before and 53 the year before that. Through the 80’s it was triple digits every year, peaking at 148 in 1987. Fell throughout the 90’s to 42 in 1999 then dropped in to the 30’s every year from 2000 until 2007 when it hit 40. Went to 50 in 2008 and has been bouncing around since then with only one year in the 30’s. Many reasons for those changes and no real need to go off the deep end due to one bad weekend.

    So 45 fatal crashes last year, 50 bikes. Five crashes involved two bikes. In four of those crashes all eight bikes were Harleys which I found interesting and probably suggests something. So in order of appearance -

    16 Harley
    7 Suzuki
    7 Yamaha
    5 Honda
    4 Triumphs
    2 each BMW, Ducati and Kawasaki
    1 each Can Am, Moto Guzzi, MV Augusta, SYM and TGB (mopeds)

    As always, without actual data as to how many of each type of bike is on the road these figures are rather meaningless, but good to point fingers. Even with the number registered we don’t know how many km each one does, in what conditions etc etc etc. So you've got to be careful when someone says X is worse than Y because Y could be worse than X, it depends what is being pushed and by whom. Hello ACC. Note, no fault is implied in any of this, it is just the bikes involved.

    I’m going to assume we can call all the Harleys cruisers here, so based on the model recorded I would say this –

    21 cruisers
    20 sport
    4 off road style
    2 proper off road
    2 moped
    1 Can am

    The sports class is actually a bit vague, I have lumped your VTR250, XJ600 and a K1200 in there as well. It is everything that is not lean back cruiser or stand on pegs on gravel stylee.

    So yeah, a few interesting things jump out. Nine out of ten crashes were on a dry road. You’d normally expect more wet road crashes than that so it does suggest a bit of fair weather riding. One quarter of the crashes were on a Sunday which is high as well. Alcohol and/or drugs were a factor in nearly half of all of these crashes. And we argue about hi-viz.

    I could go on but Coro is about to start.

  5. #170
    Join Date
    2nd March 2018 - 15:32
    Bike
    1998 Yamaha R1
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,685
    Hard to believe that alcohol was a factor in half of the crashes. Although if you go past almost any rural bar on a Sunday, there will be a fair few bikes parked.

    When they say it was a factor, does that mean there was some alcohol present, or the rider was over the legal limit?

  6. #171
    Join Date
    5th December 2009 - 12:32
    Bike
    Yes
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    3,284
    Quote Originally Posted by SaferRides View Post
    Hard to believe that alcohol was a factor in half of the crashes. Although if you go past almost any rural bar on a Sunday, there will be a fair few bikes parked.
    I knew someone would pick me up on that as soon as I posted it bugger it. Alcohol includes drugs there. Ten of the 45 crashes had someone with alcohol over the limit while 12 were drugs. Edited the post to correct that.

  7. #172
    Join Date
    6th May 2013 - 20:16
    Bike
    Red-shifted GT250R
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by trustme View Post
    I guess fatals cost ACC fuck all. Surviving the off is where the costs really kick in.
    No, fatals still cost ACC a shed-load. They pay surviving partners based on the dead person's earnings.

    From ACC's website:
    We pay 80% of the deceased's earnings.

    We’ll keep making payments to a partner until either:
    - five years from the date payments started
    - the youngest child of the deceased in your care turns 18.

    That adds up. Whether it is more or less than the medical bills, I don't know.

  8. #173
    Join Date
    19th January 2013 - 16:56
    Bike
    a 400 and a 650 :-)
    Location
    The Isthmus
    Posts
    1,611
    A little more about "looking" and "seeing"...


  9. #174
    Join Date
    5th December 2009 - 12:32
    Bike
    Yes
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    3,284
    Quote Originally Posted by Berries View Post
    And here's another.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/108...d-in-collision

    I am genuinely surprised nobody had posted this seeing as a week ago people were getting all hot and bothered about it.

  10. #175
    Join Date
    13th July 2008 - 20:48
    Bike
    S1000XR
    Location
    Hanmer Springs
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by Berries View Post
    And here's another.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/108...d-in-collision

    I am genuinely surprised nobody had posted this seeing as a week ago people were getting all hot and bothered about it.
    That's the thing. Big media storm then everyone moves on.

  11. #176
    Join Date
    3rd May 2010 - 18:46
    Bike
    ZX14R, KX500E16, CR500R
    Location
    Westbridge
    Posts
    880
    Quote Originally Posted by Berries View Post
    Well, perhaps Rastus can confirm ACC claims, but figured I would jump in with some numbers as well. Seems like an annual thing.

    45 fatal crashes in 2017 involving motorbikes. Down from 55 the year before and 53 the year before that. Through the 80’s it was triple digits every year, peaking at 148 in 1987. Fell throughout the 90’s to 42 in 1999 then dropped in to the 30’s every year from 2000 until 2007 when it hit 40. Went to 50 in 2008 and has been bouncing around since then with only one year in the 30’s. Many reasons for those changes and no real need to go off the deep end due to one bad weekend.

    So 45 fatal crashes last year, 50 bikes. Five crashes involved two bikes. In four of those crashes all eight bikes were Harleys which I found interesting and probably suggests something. So in order of appearance -

    16 Harley
    7 Suzuki
    7 Yamaha
    5 Honda
    4 Triumphs
    2 each BMW, Ducati and Kawasaki
    1 each Can Am, Moto Guzzi, MV Augusta, SYM and TGB (mopeds)

    As always, without actual data as to how many of each type of bike is on the road these figures are rather meaningless, but good to point fingers. Even with the number registered we don’t know how many km each one does, in what conditions etc etc etc. So you've got to be careful when someone says X is worse than Y because Y could be worse than X, it depends what is being pushed and by whom. Hello ACC. Note, no fault is implied in any of this, it is just the bikes involved.

    I’m going to assume we can call all the Harleys cruisers here, so based on the model recorded I would say this –

    21 cruisers
    20 sport
    4 off road style
    2 proper off road
    2 moped
    1 Can am

    The sports class is actually a bit vague, I have lumped your VTR250, XJ600 and a K1200 in there as well. It is everything that is not lean back cruiser or stand on pegs on gravel stylee.

    So yeah, a few interesting things jump out. Nine out of ten crashes were on a dry road. You’d normally expect more wet road crashes than that so it does suggest a bit of fair weather riding. One quarter of the crashes were on a Sunday which is high as well. Alcohol and/or drugs were a factor in nearly half of all of these crashes. And we argue about hi-viz.

    I could go on but Coro is about to start.
    I'm interested in the proportion of these numbers that were caused by a 4 wheeled vehicle fucking it up. Every day you see car and truck drivers on their phone . A bit difficult to send a text when you're riding a Hayabusa or a GN125. My 5 cents

  12. #177
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,125
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by SaferRides View Post
    ... When they say it was a factor, does that mean there was some alcohol present, or the rider was over the legal limit?
    10 km/hr over the speed limit and "speed" is a factor. Just as "under the influence" does not necessarily mean over the limit ... just "A factor" ...
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  13. #178
    Join Date
    21st January 2007 - 18:47
    Bike
    triumph scrambler
    Location
    auckland
    Posts
    564
    Quote Originally Posted by Stylo View Post
    I'm interested in the proportion of these numbers that were caused by a 4 wheeled vehicle fucking it up. Every day you see car and truck drivers on their phone . A bit difficult to send a text when you're riding a Hayabusa or a GN125. My 5 cents
    3 riders, 1 pillion killed not 1 car involved.To be blunt rider error in all cases. Over 50% of motorcycle accidents are single vehicle ie no car involved

    I'd ask for my money back

  14. #179
    Join Date
    5th December 2009 - 12:32
    Bike
    Yes
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    3,284
    Quote Originally Posted by Stylo View Post
    I'm interested in the proportion of these numbers that were caused by a 4 wheeled vehicle fucking it up. Every day you see car and truck drivers on their phone . A bit difficult to send a text when you're riding a Hayabusa or a GN125. My 5 cents
    When asked about fault in motorbike crashes I always think of a third, third and third and as it happens that is roughly how this looks. To be fully accurate you would need to read the full reports and even then, one of the main witnesses isn't around to be interviewed so it will never be 100 percent.

    By my brief reckoning 16 crashes involved a bike and no other moving vehicles, 15 crashes involved more than one vehicle and the bike rider would appear to be primarily at fault and the remaining 14 crashes involved more than one vehicle and the primary fault would appear to rest with the other vehicle.

    Fault is a curious thing though. I am of the view that in the majority of crashes where the other vehicle is considered to be at fault the rider could have got away with it if they had been concentrating on things.

  15. #180
    Join Date
    3rd May 2010 - 18:46
    Bike
    ZX14R, KX500E16, CR500R
    Location
    Westbridge
    Posts
    880
    Quote Originally Posted by Berries View Post
    When asked about fault in motorbike crashes I always think of a third, third and third and as it happens that is roughly how this looks. To be fully accurate you would need to read the full reports and even then, one of the main witnesses isn't around to be interviewed so it will never be 100 percent.

    By my brief reckoning 16 crashes involved a bike and no other moving vehicles, 15 crashes involved more than one vehicle and the bike rider would appear to be primarily at fault and the remaining 14 crashes involved more than one vehicle and the primary fault would appear to rest with the other vehicle.

    Fault is a curious thing though. I am of the view that in the majority of crashes where the other vehicle is considered to be at fault the rider could have got away with it if they had been concentrating on things.
    Ok, so we have no validated statistics then. What does that tell you ?

    We still don't know how many cars / trucks etc were involved and, the numbers are meaningless without those statistics included.

    By my brief reckoning indeed ....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •